Diplomacy & Defense Think Tank News

This study examines portrayals of marine mammal celebrities (MMCs) in popular culture over the past 70 years, reflecting evolving public attitudes toward ocean conservation. It identifies four main types of MMCs, each linked to a specific era and shaped by changes in media landscapes, perceptions of marine mammal agency and welfare, and conservation priorities: (1) Hollywood MMCs (ca. 1960–1990s)—wild animals captured and exhibited in aquaria, cast as celebrities based on their roles in traditional mass media (blockbuster movies); (2) MMCs in human care (ca. 1990s–2010s)—animals housed in aquaria whose fame stemmed from public concern about their welfare and calls for their release; (3) rescued MMCs (ca. 1980s–present)—marine mammals cared for by humans after they were injured in the ocean; and (4) endangered and dangerous MMCs (2010s–present)—wild animals that approach humans, demonstrate human‐like behaviours, or interact with boats. Introducing the method of “following the animal,” the article provides examples of celebrity animals that illustrate each of the four categories, such as the dolphin Flipper and the walrus Freya. The study contributes to the thematic issue on "Ocean Pop: Marine Imaginaries in the Age of Global Polycrisis" by highlighting the mutual influence of media, animal celebrity, and conservation, and urges further research into how shifting representations shape global engagement with marine life and the environment.

The emerging global system is one in which three nuclear-armed leaders, insulated from dissent, pursue risky gambits. The result will not be the relatively stable if tense competition that characterized the Cold War. It will be something more volatile: a world in which the most consequential decisions rest on the whims of men who have systematically discarded anyone willing to tell them no.

The emerging global system is one in which three nuclear-armed leaders, insulated from dissent, pursue risky gambits. The result will not be the relatively stable if tense competition that characterized the Cold War. It will be something more volatile: a world in which the most consequential decisions rest on the whims of men who have systematically discarded anyone willing to tell them no.

The emerging global system is one in which three nuclear-armed leaders, insulated from dissent, pursue risky gambits. The result will not be the relatively stable if tense competition that characterized the Cold War. It will be something more volatile: a world in which the most consequential decisions rest on the whims of men who have systematically discarded anyone willing to tell them no.

Seit Monaten übt die US-Regierung Druck auf verschiedene Universitäten im Land aus. Nun hat dieser Druck eine neue Form angenommen: Von der University of Pennsylvania will die Trump-Regierung eine Zusammenstellung über alle jüdischen Angestellten und Studierenden haben.

Donald Trump hat seine Forderung nach Grönland auch mit der mangelnden Verteidigungsfähigkeit Dänemarks in der Region begründet. Hat er damit etwa recht?

Since 2004, the European Union (EU) and India have fostered a strategic partnership, with Summits held over the years to strengthen their relations. Despite periodic inconsistencies and obstacles that have hindered the partnership’s growth, their collaboration appears to have gained renewed momentum in 2025. Attention has been growing for the upcoming 2026 Summit, which has the potential to serve as a crucial opportunity to deepen their ties. This policy brief reviews their bilateral interactions, addresses current challenges in the EU-India relations, and explores expectations for the upcoming Summit. It also underscores Greece’s role in identifying new opportunities to deepen EU-India cooperation and suggests measures to further enhance their strategic partnership.

Read here in pdf the Policy paper by George Dikaios, Marie Curie Fellow, Leiden University; Senior Research Fellow, ELIAMEP and Marianna Terezaki, Junior Research Fellow, ELIAMEP.

President Trump’s hostile and erratic foreign policy actions accelerated the India-EU relationship – including a long-awaited FTA.

Der Wirtschaftsflügel der CDU hat vorgeschlagen, das Recht auf Teilzeitarbeit abzuschaffen, um dem Fachkräftemangel entgegenzuwirken. Dies kommentiert Katharina Wrohlich, Leiterin der Forschungsgruppe Gender Economics im DIW Berlin, wie folgt: 

Die Abschaffung des Rechtsanspruchs auf Teilzeit würde den Fachkräftemangel in Deutschland nicht lösen. Besser wäre es, an anderer Stelle anzusetzen: Zum einen müssten das Angebot und die Qualität der Kinderbetreuung deutlich verbessert werden, denn nicht alle Frauen arbeiten freiwillig in Teilzeit – manche würden gerne ihre Arbeitszeit erhöhen, können dies aber aufgrund mangelnder Kinderbetreuung nicht.

Zum anderen müssten die finanziellen Anreize zur Mehrarbeit speziell für die Gruppe erhöht werden, die derzeit besonders häufig in Teilzeit ist: verheiratete Frauen. Eine Reform des Ehegattensplittings könnte eine höhere Wochenarbeitszeit für Frauen finanziell deutlich attraktiver machen. Das jetzige Steuersystem belohnt vor allem die Aufteilung, dass einer Vollzeit arbeitet und (meist) eine im Minijob. Dementsprechend sollte auch die Minijob-Regelung reformiert und auf Schüler*innen, Studierende und Rentner*innen begrenzt werden. Durch eine solche Reform wäre eine gleichmäßigere Aufteilung der Erwerbs- und Sorgearbeit für Paare attraktiver. Dies wäre nicht nur aus arbeitsmarktpolitischer, sondern auch aus gleichstellungspolitischer Perspektive wichtig: Es würde die ökonomische Eigenständigkeit von Frauen erhöhen und hätte nicht zuletzt auch einen positiven Einfluss auf deren Alterseinkünfte."

Die Vermögen der Wenigen explodieren, während die Masse schaut, wo sie bleibt. Deutschland muss das ändern – und könnte Vorbild sein. Denn es geht um die Demokratie., Während sich in Davos im Januar die Mächtigen der Welt zum Weltwirtschaftsforum versammeln, legt die neue Oxfam-Studie den Finger in eine der offenen Wunden unserer globalen Ordnung. Hinter den wohlfeilen Schlagworten vieler Wirtschaftslenker und Politiker – "Resilienz", "Nachhaltigkeit" und ...

With the entry into force of the United Nations treaty for the protection of the high seas on 17 January, an important step has been taken towards the protection of “biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction” (BBNJ). The so-called BBNJ Agreement aims to promote the transparent and diverse exchange of knowledge about the high seas in order to strengthen environmental standards. However, against the backdrop of a geopolitical environment in which knowledge itself is increasingly politicised, the question arises as to how this knowledge diversity can be secured over the long term.

The Clearing-House Mechanism: Technical Tool or Political Lever?

At the centre of this debate lies an instrument with an unassuming name: the so-called BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM). It is intended to become a freely accessible platform on which information about activities on the high seas is collected, analysed, and shared. Its objectives include enhancing transparency among State Parties and relevant stakeholders, as well as facilitating international cooperation, particularly in scientific matters. Although the goals and basic structure of the CHM are defined in the treaty text, its concrete design remains the subject of ongoing negotiation – and it is precisely this element that makes the mechanism politically contested.

The treaty text explicitly opens the possibility of incorporating different forms of knowledge into decision-making processes through the CHM. In particular, diverse knowledge systems could be systematically integrated within the framework put forward for mandatory environmental impact assessments. States would be required not only to assess potential environmental impacts, but also to consider the economic, social, cultural, health-related, and cumulative effects of planned activities that take place in or affect the high seas. Such a comprehensive assessment of impacts necessitates contributions from a range of scientific disciplines as well as the knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities.

A further opportunity for the practical implementation of knowledge pluralism is found in the provisions concerning the composition of the Scientific and Technical Body (STB). The relevant wording in the agreement suggests that this body should go beyond purely natural scientific expertise and incorporate a broader spectrum of local, traditional, and Indigenous knowledge related to the marine environment. Since the STB can issue recommendations about activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction on the basis of information provided through the CHM, this represents a key lever for translating the knowledge diversity promised in the treaty text into practice. This depends, however, on whether the STB is in fact constituted in a way that ensures adequate representation of different knowledge systems.

Political Conflicts Delay the Implementation of the Agreement

Despite the treaty’s promising language, the concrete design of the CHM remains politically contentious. Within the Preparatory Commission (PrepCom), which is tasked with operationalising the agreement, this issue has emerged as one of the central points of conflict. At a PrepCom meeting in August 2025, Parties were unable to reach agreement on the composition of an informal expert group intended to develop the technical aspects of the CHM. The selection process for this informal group is of strategic importance, as it could set a precedent for the composition of other BBNJ bodies. Whereas some states are advocating for the broad inclusion of a range of knowledge holders, others seek to reduce the CHM to a purely natural scientific and technical function guided exclusively by academic expertise. Critics warn that such an approach could privilege natural scientific knowledge from the Global North and marginalise social scientific, local, or traditional forms of knowledge.

Against the background of recent attempts by individual states, including the United States, to restrict access to marine data, it becomes clear that knowledge about the oceans is itself increasingly becoming an object of political contestation. Germany and the EU have repeatedly spoken out during international forums in favour of the freedom and diversity of science. In the context of the ongoing negotiations on the operationalisation of the BBNJ Agreement, they should therefore make targeted efforts to ensure that knowledge diversity within the agreement is not merely recognised normatively, but institutionally safeguarded as well. This is primarily about preventing the privileging of certain forms of knowledge within BBNJ bodies, such as the Scientific and Technical Body. At the same time, the CHM platform itself must be designed in such a way that different knowledge types can be made equally accessible.

 

Das SCP ist eine Längsschnittstudie, die vielfältige Aspekte des gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts in Deutschland erfasst. Es basiert auf einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe aus deutschen Einwohnermelderegistern und wurde 2021 zum ersten Mal durchgeführt (n=17.027). Neben den zufällig ...

Während die Welt nach Grönland schaut, bleibt es in Gaza unruhig.

Wolf-Peter Schill spricht in Folge #39 von 'fossilfrei' mit Prof. Patrick Plötz, Leiter des Geschäftsfelds Energiewirtschaft am Fraunhofer-ISI, über das vermeintliche Aus vom Verbrenner-Aus (don’t call it Verbrennerverbot). Was genau steckt im Automobilpaket der EU-Kommission, und was bedeutet das ...

Die Abteilung Makroökonomie des Deutschen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin) analysiert gesamtwirtschaftliche Zusammenhänge mit empirischen und theoretischen Methoden. Die Forschungsarbeiten der Abteilung ordnen sich den drei Themenbereichen Konjunkturpolitik der europäischen Währungsunion, Makroökonomie und Verteilung und Makroökonomische Aspekte des Klimawandels zu. In den Forschungsarbeiten werden Modelle entwickelt und Datensätze generiert. Die Forschungsergebnisse bilden die Grundlage für die Infrastruktur der Prognose und Politikberatung. So fließen die Ergebnisse direkt in die Prognosen des DIW Berlin und die Gemeinschaftsdiagnose ein.

Wir suchen zum nächstmöglichen Zeitpunkt zwei studentische Hilfskräfte (w/m/d) für jeweils 12 Wochenstunden.

Kanadas Premier Mark Carney sieht die bestehende Weltordnung am Ende und wirbt für neue Bündnisse. Welche Rolle Europa dabei spielen könnte und wo die Grenzen einer engeren Anbindung Kanadas an die EU liegen, erläutert Politologin Laura von Daniels.