Enhancing the electoral participation of persons with disabilities was the focus of discussion during a conference co-organized in Skopje by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the OSCE Mission to Skopje on 6 February 2019.
The event brought together 55 participants (30 women and 25 men), including representatives of national authorities and disabled persons’ organizations. The participants included officials from the State Election Commission, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy and the Ministry of Education and Science, as well as representatives of political parties, the Interparty Parliamentary Group for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and international organizations. ODIHR invited leading experts in the field from Austria, Slovenia and United States.
The event raised the participants’ awareness about the limited participation of persons with disabilities in electoral process. It also helped to identify measures that can reflect OSCE commitments and address ODIHR’s electoral recommendations aimed at improving the situation.
Key topics discussed were challenges and obstacles to the inclusion of persons with disabilities in electoral process and how to create an enabling environment based on good practices and lessons learned in the region and elsewhere.
“Electoral processes highlight accessibility issues, different levels of inclusion and legal capacity problems. These processes are an excellent indicator, a litmus test, of how committed a state is to a human rights-based approach to disability and to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” said Goran Kustura, Secretary General of the National Council of Slovenian Organizations of Persons with Disabilities.
Ambassador Clemens Koja, Head of the OSCE Mission to Skopje, said: “We are glad to contribute to the important task of promoting and ensuring accessible voting for persons with disabilities. By protecting their rights and ensuring their full and effective participation in the conduct of public affairs, without discrimination and on an equal basis with others, we encourage their participation in public affairs.”
“The State Election Commission continuously implements activities for ensuring accessibility to electoral processes for persons with disabilities,” said Oliver Derkoski, President of the State Election Commission. However, to ensure comprehensive and equal access for this group of voters, which is our mutual goal, we require open co-operation with other institutions responsible for polling stations, as well as with the civic sector. In this way we can raise awareness of the needs in this area.”
The event part of ODIHR’s project Support to Elections in the Western Balkans, which is funded by the European Union and the Austrian Development Agency.
Ibolya Tibor a közleményében azt írta, a terjesztői piramis csúcsán egy 43 éves férfi állt, aki 2016 áprilisától árulta a kábítószert “viszonteladói tételekben” társának, aki azt a vele kapcsolatban álló kábítószer-kereskedőknek adta tovább, akik szintén továbbértékesítették az árut, egészen a fogyasztókkal kapcsolatot tartó vádlottakig.
A rendőrség felderítette a piramis csúcsán álló vádlott beszerzési forrásait és összehangolt akcióban elfogta a vádlottakat, akiknél a kábítószeren kívül anabolikus szteroidokat és engedély nélküli potencianövelő gyógyszereket is találtak.
A főügyészség közokirat-hamisítás miatt is vádat emelt: az egyik kereskedő ugyanis a kábítószerből származó pénzből vett egy autót, de – hogy a vételár tényleges forrását leplezze -, megkért egy férfit, hogy színleg írassa a nevére az autót.
VIENNA, 6 February – The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Harlem Désir, today raised his concerns over the amendments to the Press Act establishing a right of reply for physical and legal persons, which passed the first reading in the parliament of Slovakia last week.
The amendments to paragraphs 8 and 10 of the Press Act would grant a right of reply which will particularly apply to political actors or public officials who claim that their honour or reputation has been damaged in media reports. The Representative underlined that the Press Act already permits a right of correction for all individuals, including politicians. With the proposed version of the right of reply, regardless of the veracity of the statements, editors would be compelled to publish a correction, under the threat of paying damages between 1,660 to 4,980 euros. This would signify a return to a similar legal provision introduced in 2008 and repealed in 2011 following strong domestic and international opposition.
“I am seriously concerned that this will represent a regression of the legal environment in Slovakia, which enables the media to report freely and without political pressure on matters of public interest,” said Désir. “I call upon the parliament of Slovakia to repeal these amendments, to protect media freedom and investigative journalism, and to take into account the objections raised by the media and civil society in the country.” The Representative expressed regret that the concerned amendments were not reviewed by the Culture Ministry’s working group responsible for reviewing media freedom legislation.
The right of reply as foreseen in these amendments goes far beyond the existing right to correction. “This represents a high risk of undue and disproportionate interference in the editorial independence of the media, and must not lead to permanent pressure or self-censorship of the media,” stated Désir. “Political actors must accept a high level of scrutiny and criticism, and the press must remain free to exercise its function without facing financial threats.”
The Representative concluded that the suggestion by the President of the CIS and the National Council to extend the right of reply to comments would exacerbate the situation further.
The RFOM previously issued a statement asking Slovakia to abandon the article in April 2008 (See: https://www.osce.org/fom/49620)
Les membres du gouvernement réunis en Conseil des ministres ce mercredi 06 février 2019, ont adopté le Plan d'actions national sur la gestion durable des terres 2018-2027.
Selon le relevé du Conseil des ministres, le défaut de planification de la gestion des terres et des ressources agroforestières a induit au fil des ans, leur dégradation avancée.
En l'espace de 35 ans, précise le Conseil des ministres, le pays a perdu environ 48% de sa forêt dense qui ne couvre désormais que 0,29% du territoire.
Une telle situation selon le gouvernement, est de nature à provoquer de plus graves dégradations physiques et une vulnérabilité accrue des écosystèmes face au changement climatique si rien n'est fait.
Ainsi, prenant la mesure de l'enjeu sur l'environnement et en vue d'y remédier durablement, il a initié en février 2018, un atelier qui a regroupé des acteurs spécialisés d'origines socioprofessionnelles diverses. Les travaux de cet atelier ont permis de mettre en place un Plan d'actions national sur la gestion durable des terres, sur une période de 30 ans. Sa mise en œuvre permettra entre autres, une appropriation et une intégration effectives de cette problématique dans les investissements couvrant plusieurs années.
F. A. A.
This report is for the media and the general public.
Summary
Ceasefire violations[1]
In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including about 200 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (95 explosions). The majority of ceasefire violations were recorded near Yasynuvata (non-government-controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk), south-east and south-west of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk) and east, south-south-east and south-south-west of Kamianka (government-controlled, 20km north of Donetsk).
In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including, however, fewer explosions (about 120), compared with the previous reporting period (about 320 explosions). The majority of ceasefire violations were recorded near Popasna (government-controlled, 69km west of Luhansk) and Holubivske (non-government-controlled, 51km west of Luhansk).
Disengagement areas[2]
On 4 February, inside the disengagement area near Zolote (government-controlled, 60km west of Luhansk), an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spotted an infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) (BMP-1) and an anti-aircraft gun (ZU-23, 23mm) approximately 650m south of the area’s northern edge and 1km east of its western edge, and again spotted an IFV (BMP-2) near the road bridge (all assessed as belonging to the Ukrainian Armed Forces).
Also inside the disengagement area, the same long-range UAV again spotted an anti-aircraft gun (ZU-23) about 100m north of its southern edge and 800m west of its eastern edge (assessed as belonging to the armed formations), as well as three recent craters assessed as impacts of mortar (120mm) rounds about 50m north-west of the checkpoint of the armed formations on the southern edge of the area (for previous observations, see SMM Daily Report 31 January 2019).
On the evening and night of 4-5 February, the SMM camera in Zolote recorded ten projectiles in flight at an assessed range of 1.5-3km south-east and south (assessed as inside the disengagement area) and ten projectiles at an assessed range of 2-3km east (assessed as outside the disengagement area).
During the day on 5 February, positioned near the checkpoint of the Ukrainian Armed Forces north the Zolote disengagement area, the SMM heard three shots of small-arms fire at an assessed range of 4-5km east (assessed as outside the disengagement area). Positioned near Zolote-3/Stakhanovets (government-controlled, 61km west of Luhansk), the SMM heard over 30 bursts and shots of heavy-machine-gun and small-arms fire at an assessed range of 4-5km south (assessed as outside the disengagement area). Positioned in Berezivske (non-government-controlled, 53km north-west of Luhansk), the SMM heard four undetermined explosions and over 20 bursts of heavy-machine-gun fire at an assessed range of 3-5km west (all assessed as outside the disengagement area).
The same day, positioned inside the disengagement area near Stanytsia Luhanska (government-controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk), the SMM observed a calm situation.[3]
Withdrawal of weapons
The SMM continued to monitor the withdrawal of weapons in implementation of the Memorandum and the Package of Measures and its Addendum.
In violation of withdrawal lines
Government-controlled areas
4 February
An SMM long-range UAV spotted:
Non-government-controlled areas
4 February
An SMM mini-UAV again spotted:
5 February
The SMM observed:
Beyond withdrawal lines but outside of designated storage sites:
Government-controlled areas
5 February
The SMM observed:
Non-government-controlled areas
4 February
An SMM long-range UAV again spotted:
Weapons that the SMM was unable to verify as withdrawn[4]
Heavy weapons holding areas beyond the respective withdrawal lines in government-controlled areas of Donetsk region
5 February
The SMM observed that:
Indications of military and military-type presence in the security zone[5]
Government-controlled areas
4 February
An SMM long-range UAV spotted:
An SMM mini-UAV spotted:
5 February
The SMM observed:
Non-government-controlled areas
4 February
An SMM long-range UAV spotted:
5 February
The SMM observed:
Long queues of civilians travelling across the contact line near Stanytsia Luhanska
At around 09:30 on 5 February, at the checkpoint of the armed formations south of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge (15km north-east of Luhansk), the SMM saw about 1,000 people queuing to travel towards government-controlled areas and about 50 people queueing in the opposite direction. About two and a half hours later, at the entry-exit checkpoint north of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge, the SMM observed about 1,000 people queuing to enter government-controlled areas and about 100 people queuing to travel in the opposite direction. Three women (aged 45-60) told the SMM that it had taken them four to five hours to cross the checkpoint of the armed formations and the entry-exit checkpoint.
SMM facilitation of repair works to civilian infrastructure
The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasefire to enable repair works to the Krasnohorivka gas distribution station between Marinka (government-controlled, 23km south-west of Donetsk) and Oleksandrivka (non-government-controlled, 20km south-west of Donetsk), as well as to enable an assessment related to snow removal near the bridge in Shchastia (government-controlled, 20km north of Luhansk). The Mission continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station (15km north of Donetsk) and of the pumping station in Vasylivka (non-government-controlled, 24km north-east of Donetsk).
The Mission continued monitoring in Kherson, Odessa, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Kharkiv, Dnipro, Chernivtsi and Kyiv.
*Restrictions of SMM’s freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of its mandate
The SMM’s monitoring and freedom of movement are restricted by security hazards and threats, including risks posed by mines, unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other impediments – which vary from day to day. The SMM’s mandate provides for safe and secure access throughout Ukraine. All signatories of the Package of Measures have agreed on the need for this safe and secure access, that restriction of the SMM’s freedom of movement constitutes a violation, and on the need for rapid response to these violations. They have also agreed that the Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) should contribute to such response and co-ordinate mine clearance. Nonetheless, the armed formations in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions frequently deny the SMM access to areas adjacent to Ukraine’s border outside control of the Government (for example, see SMM Daily Report 4 February 2019). The SMM’s operations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions remain restricted following the fatal incident of 23 April 2017 near Pryshyb; these restrictions continued to limit the Mission’s observations.
Denial of access:
Regular restrictions related to disengagement areas and mines/UXO:
Other impediments:
[1] For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, winter weather conditions limited the observation capabilities of some SMM cameras. The SMM camera in Chermalyk was not operational for most of the reporting period.
* Please see the section at the end of this report entitled “Restrictions of the SMM’s freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of its mandate”.
[2] Disengagement is foreseen in the Framework Decision of the Trilateral Contact Group relating to disengagement of forces and hardware of 21 September 2016.
[3] Due to the presence of mines, including on a road between Bohdanivka and Petrivske, the SMM’s access to its camera in Petrivske remains limited, and thus the SMM has not been able to access observations from the camera since 22 June 2018.
[4] The SMM observed weapons that could not be verified as withdrawn, as their storage did not comply with the criteria set out in the 16 October 2015 notification from the SMM to the signatories of the Package of Measures on effective monitoring and verification of the withdrawal of heavy weapons.
[5] The hardware mentioned in this section is not proscribed by the provisions of the Minsk agreements on the withdrawal of weapons.
[6] The interference could have originated from anywhere within the radius of several kilometres of the UAV’s position.