Africa

Members of the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) gather at the COP31 climate summit, calling on governments to prioritise zero-waste solutions and methane reduction over waste-to-energy incineration in Antalya, Türkiye, on November 10, 2026. Credit: Nipe Fagio

By Chemtai Kirui
ANTALYA, Türkiye & NAIROBI, Nov 13 2026 (IPS)

Plans to build waste incineration plants across Africa risk undermining efforts to curb methane emissions, zero-waste campaigners have warned, as world leaders and climate negotiators gather in Antalya, Türkiye, for the COP31 climate summit.

Waste management and methane reduction are among the issues under discussion at the summit, with campaigners saying that governments should prioritise waste separation, composting and recycling over investment in incineration infrastructure.

Weyinmi Okotie, executive director of the Green Knowledge Foundation, said only 55% of municipal solid waste was collected across Africa, with just 4% recycled.

Organic material accounts for as much as 70% of municipal waste in some African cities, Okotie said, much of which ends up in dumpsites and landfills.

As it decomposes in oxygen-poor conditions, the waste releases methane, a greenhouse gas with about 80 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period.

Food waste accounts for up to 14% of global methane emissions, according to a 2026 report by the UN Environment Programme

Mary Nyambura Kanyui at her recycling aggregation yard on Juja Road in Nairobi’s
Eastleigh area, where she buys recyclable materials from waste pickers. Credit: Chemtai Kirui/IPS

and UN-Habitat. The report estimated that 1.05bn tonnes of food were wasted in 2022, even as 783mn people faced hunger.

A ministerial declaration issued at COP31 by countries participating in the Global Methane Pledge called on governments to prevent organic waste from being sent to landfill, expand resource recovery, and capture methane emissions where avoidance is not yet possible.

The declaration reaffirmed the Global Methane Pledge‘s goal of cutting global methane emissions by at least 30 per cent below 2020 levels by 2030. It was endorsed by seven countries: Belgium, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Norway, the UK and the Federated States of Micronesia.

The declaration was issued as ministers and private-sector representatives met to assess progress towards the target.

Existing commitments are projected to deliver only 10–11 per cent of the emissions reductions needed by 2030, participants warned, and they called for stronger policies, improved emissions monitoring, and increased public and private investment.

They called for stronger policies, improved emissions monitoring and greater investment to accelerate methane reductions across the energy, agriculture and waste sectors.

Global municipal solid waste is projected to rise from 2.1bn tonnes in 2023 to 3.8bn tonnes by 2050, according to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). The annual cost of managing waste, including the effects of pollution, ill health and climate change, could reach US$640.3bn by then if current trends persist.

A shift towards a circular economy, in which materials are reused rather than discarded, could instead generate net annual economic gains of US$108.5bn by 2050, UNEP estimates.

Türkiye’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, urged governments to embrace zero-waste initiatives, saying efforts to reduce rubbish and increase recycling could help cut emissions and tackle the climate crisis.

His call came as Türkiye’s COP31 presidency urged countries to halve the projected growth in global annual waste generation by 2035. The proposed target shifts the focus from waste collection and disposal towards preventing waste at source, extending the life of materials and reducing emissions from discarded organic matter.

Sherphine Apiyo Kochiyo, a monitoring and evaluation officer at Kenya’s Centre for Environment Justice and Development (CEJAD), attends the COP31 climate summit in Antalya, Türkiye. Credit: GAIA

Wednesday was designated Zero Waste Day at COP31, with discussions focusing on circularity and methane reduction.

But campaigners warned that the growing promotion of waste-to-energy incinerators in African countries risked locking cities into costly infrastructure and diverting investment from waste prevention, composting and recycling.

An average of USD 4.1bn a year in climate finance was tracked for methane reduction in the solid-waste sector in 2021–22, but 94 per cent of that funding — USD 3.86bn — went to projects involving undifferentiated waste incineration, according to the Climate Policy Initiative.

Just USD 223m went to targeted waste-management measures, such as landfill-gas capture and food-waste anaerobic digestion. A further USD 22m was directed to organic-waste management. Sub-Saharan Africa received 57 per cent of the funding for targeted projects, the analysis found.

A report by the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), published in October, identified 15 waste-to-energy incineration projects and proposals across 10 African countries, with combined estimated capital costs exceeding US$4bn.

Public funding was the largest identified source of finance. Yet only one project — the Reppie plant in Ethiopia — was operational. Two others were under construction, while the remaining 12 were at various stages of approval, financing, planning or proposal.

Chythenyen Devika Kulasekaran, a researcher at India’s Centre for Financial Accountability, said companies were increasingly promoting incineration in Africa after pushing the technology in parts of Asia.

Waste workers with the Nipe Fagio waste collection service sift through compost to remove larger particles during the production of organic fertiliser in Bonyokwa, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2023. Credit: Nipe Fagio

Kulasekaran cited a proposed plant in Casablanca, Morocco, which would be the largest incinerator in Africa if built. An agreement for the project was signed in August, he said, although details of its financing remained unavailable.

Desmond Alugnoa, programme manager for zero waste and climate at GAIA, said governments facing waste-management problems and electricity shortages were attracted by the prospect of generating power from rubbish.

But incinerators required large upfront investments and a constant supply of waste to operate, he said. Alugnoa cited Ethiopia’s Reppie plant, which he said had received substantial public investment but generated relatively little electricity for the national grid compared with its operating costs.

Such projects also risked diverting public money from efforts to reduce waste before it was discarded, Alugnoa said.

Across eastern, western and southern Africa, community-based waste workers are already recovering organic waste and recyclable materials that might otherwise end up in dumpsites and landfills.

In Ngong, located on the outskirts of Nairobi, Kenya, Michael Wangombe collects food waste from markets and nearby businesses and supplies it to a black soldier fly project, where larvae convert the organic material into fertiliser.

Collectors are paid about KSh80 (US$0.62) for each bucket of waste collected. The material is weighed before being fed to the larvae, while the remaining residue is processed into fertiliser for agricultural use.

Wangombe is a member of the Ngong Social Justice and Environmental Centre, whose members have received protective equipment and support in finding buyers through the Danish Refugee Council’s Fair Recycling project.

Maurice Onzere, project manager of the Danish Refugee Council’s Fair Recycling project, said the initiative was helping waste pickers move from informal collection into more structured recycling businesses.

Participants receive training in waste segregation, financial management and market access, and are linked to aggregation centres where they can sell recovered materials to recycling companies.

Further along the waste-recovery chain, Mary Nyambura Kanyui runs an aggregation yard on Juja Road in Nairobi’s Eastleigh area, buying recyclable materials from waste pickers and selling them to recycling companies.

Kanyui spent three years collecting waste before setting up the business nearly six years ago. She now employs five workers, each earning KSh600 ($4.57) a day.

The Danish Refugee Council has helped her establish links with buyers, including recycling companies.

Onzere said women accounted for 57% of the waste pickers engaged by the programme in December 2025, up from less than 12% in 2021. The project works with about 4,000 waste pickers, including refugees and members of host communities.

In Tanzania, the environmental organisation Nipe Fagio works with waste pickers in Dar es Salaam to turn organic waste into fertiliser using black soldier fly larvae. The organisation is also working with the city of Zanzibar on plans for a zero-waste island.

A similar model is being pursued in Ghana, where a project established with Alugnoa’s support converts food and other organic waste into compost for urban farmers. The initiative also works with farmers to demonstrate its use. Despite operating across several municipalities, it processes less than 70 per cent of the city’s organic waste, Alugnoa said.

Durban, South Africa offers another approach. At Warwick Market, a project diverts unsold food from traders for use as animal feed, with the remaining waste sent for composting.

These initiatives were among the approaches discussed at the COP31 Food and Agriculture Pavilion, where practitioners from Tanzania, Uganda and Indonesia shared experiences of using black soldier fly larvae, biogas and composting to manage organic waste and reduce methane emissions.

Piotr Barczak of Africa Circular presented the BUGS project, which supports the development of black soldier fly systems across Africa. Representatives of Tanzania’s Nipe Fagio, Uganda’s Collect Village and GAIA Asia Pacific in Indonesia also outlined how these approaches were being applied in their respective countries.

But expanding such initiatives and the wider systems that support waste recovery requires investment.

Kanyui said she could make a profit of KSh10,000–15,000 (US$77–116) on days when she sold plastic after paying her workers. But banks were reluctant to lend to her because they did not consider the materials and equipment at her yard sufficient collateral.

“Someone goes to the yard the first time and sees rubbish,” she said.

Kanyui said access to a loan would allow her to buy more recyclable materials and that she would be able to repay it quickly.

Kenya’s Sustainable Waste Management Act, passed in 2022, requires waste to be separated at source and makes producers responsible for the environmental impact of products they introduce to the market. Regulations gazetted in November 2024 established an extended producer responsibility (EPR) framework, requiring companies to finance the collection and recycling of waste from their products.

Companies can meet these obligations individually or through producer responsibility organisations (PROs), which collect contributions from members and arrange for the recovery and recycling of discarded materials.

Dorothy Adhiambo Otieno, a programme officer at Kenya’s Centre for Environment Justice and Development (CEJAD), said some PROs had initially subsidised recycling companies buying recovered materials before shifting their support to aggregators, who collect materials from waste pickers and supply them to recyclers.

Some PROs were now exploring direct payments to waste pickers, Otieno said. But workers operating informally faced documentation requirements, including obtaining personal identification numbers from the Kenya Revenue Authority, which could make it difficult for them to receive payments.

Figures published by the Kenya Extended Producer Responsibility Organisation (KEPRO) show that its subsidy framework for September–December 2026 allocates 30 per cent of funding to recyclers, 25 per cent to aggregators, 15 per cent to transporters and the remaining 30 per cent to waste collectors.

Individual waste pickers and community-based organisations can participate through contracted aggregators. Guidance issued by the National Environment Management Authority (Nema) also provides for direct payments to waste pickers at collection points and material recovery facilities.

Producers are required to publish the rates they pay for waste collection services, the guidance says.

Sherphine Apiyo Kochiyo, a monitoring and evaluation officer at CEJAD, said the framework was welcome, but its effectiveness would depend on whether funding reached the workers recovering the waste.

Speaking on the sidelines of COP31, Kochiyo called for greater investment in community-based waste management, including separate collection vehicles for organic and dry waste, support for compost standards and certification, and funding to help community organisations participate in developing waste-management policies.

Campaigners warned that expanding incineration capacity risked diverting investment from waste reduction, recycling and composting. Kulasekaran said the plants’ need for a steady supply of rubbish could also lock cities into long-term dependence on incineration, rather than encouraging efforts to reduce waste at the source.

UN secretary-general António Guterres urged governments to move beyond pledges and increase investment in waste collection, composting and circular infrastructure. Citing projects in Durban, Dhaka and Kampala that convert organic waste into compost, fertiliser and animal feed, he said such initiatives could create jobs and lower costs.

“The era of pledges is over. The world needs action,” Guterres said.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

 

 

 

Related Articles

• COP31: New Research Ties Extreme Weather and Mental Health Challenges in Africa
• Protecting the Climate Means Protecting Territorial Rights
• Drought Cripples Dairy Farmers in Maharashtra in ‘Off the Charts’ Weather Year

By CIVICUS
Nov 13 2026 (IPS)

 
CIVICUS discusses the case for United Nations (UN) reform with Heba Aly, director of the Article 109 Coalition, an international civil society network that calls on states to review and update the UN Charter.

Heba Aly

In its ninth decade, the UN is in deep crisis. Major powers are rewriting the international rules and the organisation has struggled to respond to wars and other global threats. So far, reform efforts have focused on spending cutbacks rather than on rebalancing power within the UN. A growing civil society coalition is now urging states to take a more ambitious route by invoking Article 109 of the UN Charter to convene a General Conference to review the founding document.

Why does the UN Charter need reforming?

Our world faces multiple existential challenges. Violence and conflict are on the rise, as seen in Gaza, Iran and Ukraine, among other places, and the UN has been unable to respond meaningfully. The changing climate is devastating communities, with the recent flooding in Nepal just the latest example. AI is going off the rails, with AI agents acting rogue in the absence of regulation. And big powers are threatening nuclear war. Our current global governance systems are not equipped to deal with any of this.

At the same time, the UN is under attack. The USA, its historic architect, is now undermining it by questioning its effectiveness, cutting its funding and establishing competing bodies. Other states are retreating from multilateralism, some because they don’t want to play by the rules, others because they feel the UN doesn’t represent the interests of the majority.

That is in part because the UN’s architecture still reflects the world of 1945 rather than that of 2026 and still privileges five countries that won a war over 80 years ago. Its Charter was adopted before the internet, before the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, before the idea of planetary boundaries.

Triggering Article 109 of the UN Charter, which establishes the process for convening a General Conference of UN member states to review and update the Charter, offers the possibility of bringing the UN into the 21st century.

How can Article 109 be triggered, and why use it?

Triggering Article 109 requires a two-thirds majority vote in the UN General Assembly, where every state has a seat, plus the support of nine of the 15 members of the Security Council. This means the five permanent members of the Security Council cannot veto a conference being held. So triggering Article 109 is very much within reach.

Article 109 offers a pathway to a renewed UN architecture that is democratic, inclusive and fit for the 21st century, and legitimate because it is rooted in the Charter. It was a concession made in 1945 to the many countries that opposed giving the five permanent Security Council members veto power, with the promise that this would be revisited by the UN’s 10th year. The purpose of Article 109 was also to offer the means to adapt the organisation to changing world circumstances, based on learning from its first years of operation. Eighty-one years on, this built-in review mechanism has never been used. It’s an opportunity hiding in plain sight.

A General Conference would bring all states together to discuss openly what is and is not working in international governance, and where changes are needed for everyone’s benefit. Many states have grievances about the current system, and giving them a chance to share their vision of a future UN can help rebuild much-needed trust.

What about the risk of making things worse?

The threats the world faces today need urgent action. If we do nothing, the UN could collapse altogether.

Our recent analysis of voting patterns at the UN General Assembly shows that efforts to roll back norms on climate change, gender and human rights have failed to secure two-thirds majority support, which is the threshold required to change the Charter. The data simply does not support the suggestion that a majority of states would back an outcome that dilutes fundamental principles of the Charter. In fact, it suggests quite the opposite. An overwhelming majority of states have expressed support for human rights and multilateralism, as evidenced by initiatives such as the Friends of Human Rights and Multilateralism, the Hague Group and Partners for Multilateralism.

A new world order is going to emerge, whether we like it or not. It will be either built by the powers who are de facto changing realities on the ground or shaped through a structured and inclusive process where every state has a voice. That’s what a General Conference to review the UN Charter would offer.

What would reform mean for people in the global majority?

Most of the effects of today’s crises are felt in global majority countries. Take climate change. It is estimated that some 143 million people in global majority countries will be displaced by its effects by 2050. The disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global majority countries was another striking example.

Most of these crises stem from failures of global governance and inequitable decision-making at the global level. And that is in part because international institutions tend to exclude global majority voices. This means the countries suffering the most do not have enough of a voice in the fora set up to tackle these challenges.

The Security Council is an example of this. Although the majority of its work is dedicated to Africa, the continent does not have a permanent seat on the Council.

A review of the UN Charter is an opportunity to rebalance power and ensure equitable access to resources and equal protection from harm. It is an opportunity for the global majority to shape the next world order in a way they could not in 1945, when many countries, still under colonial rule, did not have a seat at the table.

What role should civil society play in reform?

There is strong public support for international cooperation and an effective UN. One recent poll found that 57 per cent of people across 34 countries want their country to work with others to take on common threats, even if it means compromising on some national interests. And in another, 73 per cent of people who had an opinion about the UN said it needed reform.

Civil society therefore has an essential role in channelling public demands for a UN that can deliver effective international cooperation. It can help push states to embrace a more ambitious vision of multilateralism and pressure them to meet the moment.

Civil society can also help think through the outcomes we want from a Charter review and from a future UN and, during negotiations, hold governments accountable for outcomes that benefit people. Those outcomes could include a much more formal role for civil society at the UN. Today civil society engagement at the UN is often a tick-box exercise, and many civil society organisations face restricted access. A renewed Charter could codify a role for civil society in international decision-making that goes beyond today’s voluntary consultative approach.

I encourage civil society organisations that are interested in rebuilding international cooperation to get in touch and join the hundred-plus organisations that are already part of our network.

There are reasons for hope. In recent months, many western leaders have echoed what leaders from the global majority have been saying for some time: that the current world order is not fair and that we need something more equitable. Now we have an opportunity to make that happen.

CIVICUS interviews a wide range of civil society activists, experts and leaders to gather diverse perspectives on civil society action and current issues for publication on its CIVICUS Lens platform. The views expressed in interviews are the interviewees’ and do not necessarily reflect those of CIVICUS. Publication does not imply endorsement of interviewees or the organisations they represent.

GET IN TOUCH
Website
Instagram
LinkedIn
Twitter

SEE ALSO
Global governance: power politics tests global rules CIVICUS | State of Civil Society Report 2026
UN: ‘The NGO Committee must be reformed to facilitate rather than obstruct civil society access’ CIVICUS Lens | Interview with Maithili Pai 24.Apr.2026
Global governance: ‘The current order could collapse, or it could be reshaped to work for everyone’ CIVICUS Lens | Interview with Waheguru Pal Sidhu 16.Apr.2026

 

 

 

 

Hall has been seeking a US visa in South Africa as other African beauty queens face similar hurdles.

The army has taken control of most of Tigray's main towns - it is unclear if the TPLF is capable of fighting back.

Ghana kick-start their Afcon 2027 qualifying campaign despite Jordan Ayew having a penalty saved, while Cameroon, Ivory Coast and Senegal register wins.

A seal navigates the icy waters of the Antarctic—an ecosystem under mounting pressure from commercial fishing and climate change. Credit: Our Antarctica/Shawn Heinrichs

By Oritro Karim
UNITED NATIONS, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

On October 30, the 45th annual meeting of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR-45) concluded in Hobart, Australia. After another year of negotiations without a consensus reached on Antarctic marine protection measures or krill fishing regulations, conservation groups are urging consumers and retailers to boycott all krill products.

Widely regarded as a vital, shared global commons, the Antarctic is home to trillions of krill. A keystone species, krill from the Southern Ocean form the backbone of the polar ecosystem, sustaining nearly every major predator, from seabirds and seals to whales. Antarctic krill possess one of the largest biomasses of any wild animal on Earth, measuring between 379 and 500 million tonnes.

In an exclusive interview with IPS, marine biologist, policy expert, and Antarctic Wildlife Alliance Executive Director Ally Kristan explained that Antarctic krill act as a “tremendous” carbon sink and are critically important for the health of the Southern Ocean. She stressed that the stability of Antarctic marine ecosystems is a major climate driver for the entire globe.

“If you lose krill, you lose the foundation of the entire Southern Ocean food web. So then, all of the predators who feed on krill and the predators who feed on the predators who feed on krill would all be decimated,” said Kristan. “So we do need a healthy Southern Ocean ecosystem, biologically and chemically, to have a healthy climate and to have as much carbon absorbed into these nutrient-rich cold waters of the Southern Ocean.”

Despite their ecological importance, industrial fishing fleets harvest hundreds of thousands of tonnes of krill annually. Given the abundance of krill biomass in the Southern Ocean, Kristan noted that the species is “probably” not being overfished, but the central issue lies with how they are being fished.

She explained that industrial krill fishing is often heavily concentrated in small areas, which can have devastating localized impacts on regional marine fauna. With krill fishing often overlapping with wildlife feeding grounds, polar predators have been increasingly forced to compete with commercial supertrawlers for food.

“Science shows us that the krill fishery and the recovering whale population both probably can’t be supported by krill populations, especially as the climate continues to change,” she said. “Fisheries have a huge compounding impact on all the climate pressures whales are already facing.”

IPS also spoke with Max Bello, an international ocean policy expert and Blue Marine Foundation’s Global MPA Specialist. He underscored the ethical concerns surrounding Antarctic krill extraction, noting that it supplies high-end consumer products, such as omega-3 supplements, pet food, and farmed fish feed, even though viable alternatives exist.

Kristan added that krill fishing has no direct use for addressing human food security. Instead, fleets from wealthy nations in the Global North—primarily Norway and China—exploit this shared global resource to supply high-end markets, risking potentially dire environmental consequences.

She highlighted the commercial market for the luxury Antarctic toothfish—commonly sold under the market name of “Chilean Seabass”—as a key example. Bello echoed these concerns, emphasizing that up to 70 percent of harvested krill goes toward salmon aquaculture, a market “which has proven to be extremely destructive around the entire world, highly polluted.”

Bello stressed that unsustainable krill fishing practices coupled with the Antarctic’s position as an Area Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ) set an alarming precedent, with global powers relying on a shared resource to enrich themselves.

“This definitely creates a big question about our governance of the oceans around the world, where we keep seeing wealthy nations and companies that have the technology and resources to exploit an area that belongs to us all,” said Bello. “So that sends a really worrisome message. A message to our nations that we are basically spectators or witnesses of how other countries continue to build wealth out of the destruction of a common resource.”

He added that the exploitation of Antarctic marine ecosystems has ripple effects that go “beyond money” that we all depend on, such as oxygen, biodiversity, and the “stability of our very vulnerable ecosystem.”

Seventeen years after CCAMLR members pledged to implement a comprehensive network of MPAs, only two have been established. In 2024, CCAMLR allowed the expiration of a critical safeguard designed to spread krill catches across four distinct management zones, which has elicited significant pushback from conservation and environmental justice groups.

Ahead of the summit, conservation groups called on governments to implement four marine protection measures: reinstating restrictions separating industrial fishing areas from wildlife feeding grounds, adopting the Antarctic Peninsula Marine Protected Area (MPA), setting a firm roadmap for completing a network of Southern Ocean MPAs, and introducing caps on krill catch limits. None of these calls were answered.

As CCAMLR continues to fail to deliver meaningful action, a growing global initiative has formed to protect Antarctic marine ecosystems by directly challenging consumer support in the markets. During NYC Climate Week in September, oceanographer Dr. Sylvia Earle and the Antarctic Avengers—a coalition of ocean leaders, policymakers, scientists, and public figures—launched a global boycott of Antarctic krill, urging consumers and retailers alike to reject all krill-derived products.

Several major retailers in the Global North have shown support for this growing movement. In April, Holland & Barrett—one of the United Kingdom’s leading international health and wellness retailers—entirely withdrew from the krill market, ceasing the sale and production of all krill-derived products.

Approximately 94 percent of German drugstores have also announced commitments to cease selling krill products. Two of Australia’s largest supermarket chains—Coles and Woolworths—followed suit. The Antarctic Wildlife Alliance continues to call on American retailers to take similar action.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

 

 

 

FC Andorra manager Carles Manso says goalkeeper Jesus Owono is yet to decide whether he will return to playing action following the death of Tenerife forward Jesus de Miguel.

Speaker of the House of Peoples' Representatives, Ethiopia, Ahmed Shide, told the African and Asian Parliamentarians’ Meeting on Policy Dialogue: Population, Development, SRHR, and Gender Equality that Africa’s young population and Asia’s varied demographic needs call for sustained investment in health, education, and decent employment, especially for young people and women. Credit: APDA

By Cecilia Russell
ADDIS ABABA & CAPE TOWN, South Africa, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

Although Africa and Asia face different demographic challenges, they share a common imperative: ensuring that legislation, policies and budgets translate into tangible improvements in people’s lives.

This was the central message of Dr Abdul-Rashid Hassan Pelpuo, Ghana’s Minister of State for Special Initiatives and President of the African Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development (FPA), in his opening address to the two-day Africa–Asia Parliamentarians’ Conference on Population and Development, held earlier this month in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The conference opened with a moment of silence in honour of former Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo, Honorary Chair of the Asian Population and Development Association (APDA), who was remembered for his contributions to international cooperation, particularly in population, development and sexual and reproductive health.

The opening session also featured addresses by Shibata Hironori, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Japan to Ethiopia, and an opening statement by Ahmed Shide, Speaker of the House of Peoples’ Representatives, Ethiopia.

A recurring theme was the importance of reliable demographic data to guide policies, budgets and long-term planning.

Shibata Hironori, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Japan to the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, said Japan has supported international cooperation and development efforts in Africa and Asia. Credit: APDA

Summing up the conference, Dr Claudia Shilumani, Africa Regional Director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), noted that Africa’s population was expected to grow by one billion by 2050, yet only about half of births were registered. She urged parliamentarians to advocate for modernised data systems, stressing that reliable information and transparent reporting were essential to measuring progress.

But data alone was not enough.

Dr Ikegami Kiyoko, Vice-Chair and Secretary-General of APDA, drew on Japan’s experience of an ageing population to demonstrate the importance of anticipating demographic change.

“Understanding population trends today helps parliamentarians anticipate future needs,” she said.

Her presentation also brought a deeply personal perspective to policymaking. Recounting her mother’s recovery from a stroke, she described how home-based medical care, rehabilitation, nursing and family support had helped her mother regain some independence and remain connected with her family.

Dr Claudia Shilumani, Africa Regional Director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), succinctly summarised a central message of the African and Asian Parliamentarians’ Meeting: Policy Dialogue on Population, Development, SRHR and Gender Equality, stating that rights need resources and resources need accountability. Credit: APDA

“Policies are ultimately about the people’s lives and dignity,” she said, emphasising that Japan’s goal was not simply to extend life expectancy but to enable people to remain healthy and independent for as long as possible.

The conference also showcased how cooperation between Africa and Asia was translating development commitments into practical interventions.

Mr Koffi Kouame, UNFPA Country Representative, highlighted an initiative involving the Ethiopian Government, UNFPA, Japan, JICA and Japanese private-sector companies to improve menstrual health while creating economic opportunities for women and girls.

Seng Nhak, an MP from Cambodia, outlined an ambitious programme to equip 1.5 million young people with vocational skills, including free training and financial support for disadvantaged participants at the African and Asian Parliamentarians’ Meeting: Policy Dialogue on Population, Development, SRHR and Gender Equality. Credit: APDA

ITOCHU Corporation provided technical training in producing absorbent sanitary shorts, while JICA, Safaricom and Sumitomo Corporation supported digital solutions, including smartphones and mobile money services that enabled women to purchase materials, manage finances and market their products.

The initiative has trained 485 women in sanitary shorts production and menstrual health management, with nearly 45 000 shorts produced across 17 workspaces in Amhara and Tigray. Approximately 33 000 people received training on reproductive and maternal health, rights and gender-based violence, while 500 women are now producing and selling the products in their communities.

Investing in young people emerged as another critical priority, particularly for Africa, where a rapidly growing youth population presents both opportunities and challenges.

UNFPA’s Jacques Emina noted that Africa’s population could reach 2.5 billion by 2050, with approximately 60% under the age of 25. He warned that youth unemployment and the mismatch between education and labour-market needs could undermine the continent’s prospects of harnessing a demographic dividend.

Drawing on South Korea’s experience, Young Hong, Deputy Regional Director, UNFPA ESARO, emphasised that building human capital required sustained investment over decades, rather than short-term projects. She highlighted how long-term investment in education, voluntary family planning and primary healthcare had contributed to the country’s economic transformation and helped break cycles of intergenerational poverty.

Yakushi Hiroyuki, Chief Representative, JICA Ethiopia Office, and Koffi Kouame, Country Representative of UNFPA, gave delegates at the African and Asian Parliamentarians’ Meeting: Policy Dialogue on Population, Development, SRHR and Gender Equality examples of pilot projects that benefit youth and women. Credit: APDA

Presentations from Ethiopia and Cambodia demonstrated how countries were working to equip young people with marketable skills.

Safaricom Ethiopia Foundation’s Bethlehem Tameru reported that more than 1 000 young people had completed foundational digital-skills training and over 1 700 had completed advanced training.

However, she stressed that success should be measured not simply by the number of people trained but by whether they secured employment, started businesses or improved their livelihoods.

“Training should not be the end of the intervention. It should be the beginning of the pathway.”

Seng Nhak, Cambodia’s MP, outlined an ambitious programme to equip 1.5 million young people with vocational skills, including free training and financial support for disadvantaged participants. He reported that 80% of graduates found employment in the companies where they had trained within six months, illustrating the importance of linking skills development directly to labour-market opportunities.

Across the presentations, a common message emerged: demographic change can create opportunities, but realising them requires sustained investment, effective partnerships and policies informed by reliable evidence.

Ultimately, as delegates repeatedly emphasised, the success of these commitments will be measured not by the promises made at international conferences but by the improvements they bring to people’s lives.

Note: The Policy Dialogue on Population, Development, SRHR and Gender Equality was organised by the Asian Population and Development Association (APDA) in collaboration with the African Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development (FPA). It was hosted by the House of Peoples’ Representatives of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. The UNFPA East and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO), the Japan Trust Fund (JTF) and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) supported the meeting.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

 

 

 

Related Articles

• Lawmakers From Three Continents Demand Action, Not Pledges, on Population and Health
• Lawmakers Need to Grapple With the ‘Human Story’ of the Aged, Youth, Women and Girls when Making Policy

Medical staff are going unpaid, lack proper training and are struggling with shortages of essential supplies, MSF warns

Tatjana Smith's decision to switch allegiance to the Netherlands is "sad" for South Africa, says the head of the nation's swimming federation.

L'aventurier britannique achève ce lundi son tour du monde. Un périple qu'il a entrepris il y a 28 ans depuis le Chili pour rentrer chez lui, au Royaume-Uni.

People wade through flooded streets in Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria, with vibrant mural art on buildings. Credit: Ben Iwara/Pexels.

By Ignatius Banda
ANTALYA, Türkiye & BULAWAYO, Zimbabwe, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

Floods. Extreme heat. Droughts. African communities have experienced it all and more.

And as has come to be expected, humanitarian agencies have responded by providing essential emergency assistance such as food aid and other critical needs for affected communities amid increasingly dwindling funding.

Amid those challenges, researchers are now calling for a shift in how African governments and aid agencies respond before and after extreme weather events by focusing on mental health challenges that emerge as a direct result of floods.

According to the Africa Centre for Strategic Studies, 27 African countries “experienced unusually heavy rainfall in 2024” and affected 11 million people. Floods left more than 2,500 dead, four million displaced, and communities lost hundreds of thousands of livestock.

The extent of such losses is enough to break the stoicism of families already struggling to make ends meet in a continent where millions live in extreme poverty.

A cohort of African researchers in diverse fields that include psychiatry, epidemiology, climate science and medicine are pointing to these figures to investigate the impact of extreme weather on the mental health of flood and extreme weather victims.

And ahead of COP31 underway in Türkiye, the link between climate change and mental health in countries on the receiving end of what is considered human-driven nature’s fury is gaining traction as researchers explore the resilience of flood victims beyond relief aid.

While this year’s Conference of the Parties has “resilient health infrastructure and climate-resilient cities” as part of “action agenda priorities”, African researchers are pushing for the inclusion of mental health and psychosocial support as a critical flashing point that demands more attention in climate change discussions.

The new study led by Professor Collins Iwuji of the Africa Health Research Institute under a project called Weather Events and Mental Health in Africa (WEMA) that brought together academics and nongovernmental organisations provides insights into the devastating effects of floods in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, Kenya and South Africa.

Members of civil society demonstrate in the corridors. Credit: UN Climate Change/Kubilay Ciftci

“There is a need to explore the lived experiences of people and communities impacted by climate change, especially those living in communities facing social and structural vulnerabilities,” the study found.

WEMA researchers say the findings are not representative of the whole African continent but “broaden the evidence on flooding and mental health across these regions.”

It raises questions about how the continent is handling the psychological impact of flooding on vulnerable communities with families losing their homes and livelihoods and how they deal with grief.

Last year, research by the United for Global Mental Health consortium found that “mental health was not included in the majority of national adaptation policies and, when it was included, it was often mentioned superficially and with no corresponding adaptation action.”

Dr Sanae Okamoto, a researcher at the United Nations University in Maastricht specialising in climate change and mental health, has observed that globally, governments were only allocating “around two percent of their health budgets to mental health, a number that will need to increase as climate change intensifies.”

Amid that deficit, WEMA scientists say the study seeks to change this situation, especially as the link between climate and mental health is also attracting the attention of European experts who are intensifying their research on the psychological effects of climate change.

And with the spectre of a super El Nino, preparing for climate-induced mental health challenges has become even more urgent.

The WEMA study notes that “the risks and impacts of climate change on mental health are already rapidly accelerating, resulting in several direct, indirect, and overarching effects that disproportionately affect those who are most vulnerable and marginalised.”

This report also comes as other researchers say new ideas such as “climate change anxiety” have entered the lexicon as part of efforts to understand the wider psychological impact of extreme weather.

“Across four countries we found that individuals exposed to flooding have a higher burden of mental disorders compared to individuals that were not,” said Professor Collins Iwuji of the Africa Health Research Institute, the WEMA research project lead.

“If you took away flooding, you would reduce the number of mental disorders in our study population by 25 percent,” Iwuji told Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism, the WEMA media partner.

A 2021 study covering young people aged between 16 and 25 years carried out in Australia, Brazil, Finland, France, India, Nigeria, the Philippines, Portugal, the UK, and the USA found that “climate change has important implications for the health and futures of children and young people, yet they have little power to limit its harm, making them vulnerable to climate anxiety.”

WEMA says the study was carried out because the “limited data on the specific effects of EWEs on mental health in Africa highlights the need for more research to guide policy and practice.”

“Mental health support must be integrated into disaster preparedness and response and the provision of psychological first aid in the immediate aftermath of these events, not six months later,” Owuji said.

Meanwhile, Oxfam reports that there have been more than 8,000 flood deaths this year (the highest level since 2013) and that monthly temperature records are being recorded in more than 100 countries, despite the toll 87 private jets have so far landed at Antalya Airport during the UN climate summit (COP31).

It says the carbon pollution of a person in the richest 1 percent has contributed 34 times more to today’s extreme heatwaves than the average person and 100 times more than someone in the poorest 50 percent. 

“These records are not accidents of weather. They are the foreseeable consequences of a fossil-fuelled economy in which those who pollute most are also the best protected from its consequences,” said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar. 

Oxfam’s analysis of data from Polluterjet reveals that 87 private jets have landed at Antalya Airport since 7 November, emitting an estimated 777 tonnes of CO₂, which is equivalent to flying around the world more than three times.

Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote’s private jet flew approximately 4,370 kilometres from Lagos to Antalya, emitting an estimated 30 tonnes of CO₂, which is roughly the same as the average person emits in six years. During COP30 last year, 66 private jet journeys were recorded.  

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

 

 

 

Related Articles

• Protecting the Climate Means Protecting Territorial Rights
• Hotter World, Older Population: How Long Can Climate COPs Ignore the Obvious?
• Drought Cripples Dairy Farmers in Maharashtra in ‘Off the Charts’ Weather Year

À peine posé le pied à Alger, la conférencière égyptienne Hala Samir se retrouve au cœur d’une vive polémique. Sa présence effective au Salon international […]

L’article SILA 2026 : polémique autour de la présence de Hala Samir, les organisateurs s’expliquent est apparu en premier sur .

By Sania Farooqui
BENGALURU, India, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

Four years after Russia’s all-out invasion of Ukraine, the human cost of the war keeps rising. Even though the global public eye is primarily glued to the progress of the conflict itself, its geopolitical implications and territorial bargaining, the millions of Ukrainian women and children experience the burden of this war that changed their lives and future forever.

Oleksandra Matviichuk, Nobel Peace Laureate & Head of the Centre for Civil Liberties

For Oleksandra Matviichuk, Ukrainian human rights lawyer, Nobel Peace Prize winner and Head of the Centre for Civil Liberties, recording the human cost of the war has become the major part of her fight for justice and accountability.

Matviichuk believes that until the war goes on, Ukrainian women would keep paying an unusual price for the opportunity to raise their children safe from Russian aggression.

Women were actively involved in humanitarian activities in Ukraine; they took care of displaced people and continued providing basic services to communities, as well as taking on duties that traditionally belong to men who either fight in the army or have fallen during the war.

However, their participation in the conflict is a huge personal sacrifice for women.

The war aggravates inequalities faced by women and girls as it makes them more vulnerable to gender-based violence, poverty, internal displacement, and psychological distress. Besides, women-led NGOs, which provide vital services ranging from psychosocial help, violence prevention, and humanitarian aid, face serious difficulties with funding in times of increased needs.

From Matviichuk’s perspective, the implications of the war go far beyond the humanitarian crisis. For her, it is the clash between two opposing systems – democracy and authoritarianism.

Matviichuk talks about the freedoms that Ukrainian women have in family and social life, comparing them with the limitations of women living in authoritarian states.

“We are fighting for our daughters. We want our daughters would never appear in situation when they have to prove someone that they also are human beings and have all freedom and all rights,” she says.

Probably there is no place where the costs of this war will become more obvious than in the life of Ukrainian children.

Children displaced, interrupted in their studies, separated from family members, attacked, and witnessing the destruction of infrastructure have lost all sense of stability and security. Many Ukrainians are forced to spend childhood in the world of air raid sirens, uncertainty and continuous loss of relatives.

According to Matviichuk, the psychological consequences of living in such conditions for a long time can cause terrible damage because trauma leaves a person trapped in the past, depriving of any future.

For the families living in Ukraine, the war has stripped them of one of the most basic necessities that can exist for anyone in this world, that is, the assurance of security in terms of knowing that they would be alive the next day. Talking about the kind of life that they have to lead today, Matviichuk explains that they go to sleep without knowing whether they or their children will wake up on the next day. “It’s very difficult to live like us when we go to bed and our children go to bed, we have no idea whether or not we will get up next morning because war is lottery and probably it will be your residential building that would be hit this night,” she explains.

However, Matviichuk says that the first sign of healing is when children start dreaming.

Collaborating with colleagues who work as psychological support for children, she asked them to record what Ukrainian children dream about.

As the result, it became clear not only how devastating war could be but how simple the children’s wishes are.

Some children dream of going to school without the need of studying online anymore. Others want to become football players in order to make their deceased parents proud of them. There is also a dream of inventing something that will help to save other people, while another dreams of becoming Secretary-General od the United Nations to prevent wars.

Others simply want their loved ones back.

“I dream that my grandmother, my best friend Misha and my dog would be alive,” reads one child’s response.

Another dreams of a new computer, Lego and, most importantly, “that Russia would stop sending missiles and drones at us.”

These are not extraordinary aspirations. They are the ordinary dreams of children who want safety, education, family and the freedom to imagine a future.

Besides the direct ramifications of displacement and violence, Matviichuk brings up another issue that is even more serious: the fate of Ukrainian children who live under the control of Russian occupation.

She says that there are systematic measures aimed at eliminating the identity of Ukrainian children through education, prohibition of language and culture, and militarization.

Matviichuk points out that children are being educated with the help of Russian textbooks which do not recognize the existence of Ukraine as a separate country. In addition, there have been reports of sending the children to Russian re-education camps where they undergo military training and identity reshaping.

According to her, the problem might be far-reaching: these children will get Russian passports and might be conscripted into the Russian army in the future.

“This is not just a human rights problem. This is a security problem.”

The issue requires the immediate international response, especially concerning the protection of children under occupation, their reunification with families, preventing forced transfer and preserving their cultural identity.

The humanitarian disaster is even further compounded by the uncertainties associated with international peace talks. Even though diplomatic endeavors have led to some hope regarding the possibility of stopping the ongoing war, Matviichuk seems to question the adequacy of such peace talks to address the problems of the people affected by the conflict.

According to Matviichuk, there is a need for continued pressure on Russia through international sanctions and confiscation of frozen Russian assets to end the war.

The international community needs to create economic and political costs that exceed the gains in the continuation of the war for the Kremlin.

Apart from these measures, it is essential to increase humanitarian efforts, empower women organizations, prevent violence against children, and provision of education, health and psychological services.

It is also important for the international community to focus on war crime prosecution, repatriation of deported children, and freeing illegally detained people.

Women and children who have been experiencing the impacts of war for years cannot only recover from rebuilding of their dilapidated structures. There is a need for the restoration of their dignity, security, economic independence and active participation in their nation-building process.

As Matviichuk explains, the effects of the war will be felt by many generations to come. Children who will lose several years of learning and who will feel the loss of their families and security will require support for many years to come even after the war ends.

The real question, however, is not only how fast Ukraine will recover, but also if the international community is ready to invest in the future that is free from fears for women and children.

A sustainable peace should guarantee not only the end of the war but also justice, accountability, freedom, and respect for the dignity of people.

Most importantly, a sustainable peace should give Ukrainian children something which they lost because of the war, the right to dream about their future.

Sania Farooqui is an independent journalist and host of The Peace Brief, a platform dedicated to amplifying the voices of women in peacebuilding and human rights.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

 

 

 

The girls started vomiting after eating oranges brought in by a fellow pupil - police are travelling to the village they came from.

For Nigerians to feel meaningful improvements, reforms will need to go beyond the promises outlined, analysts say.

For Nigerians to feel meaningful improvements, reforms will need to go beyond the promises outlined, analysts say.

This is the final article in a four-part series.

By Saber Azam
GENEVA, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

This is the final article in a four-part series with related titles, highlighting the responsibility of mainstream media and religious leaders for the world’s current appalling state and the calamities that may await future generations if proper measures are not taken in time. When megalomania is given a “human face,” historical facts are distorted, acts of aggression are whitewashed, unlawful wars are portrayed as vehicles of “democracy, human rights, and morality,” other people’s intelligence is undermined and mocked, bias overshadows international norms, and religion becomes an instrument of bigotry, I sustain my accusation:

Saber Azam

I Accuse the Mainstream Media

The media is often described as a primary mechanism for informing the public about crucial social, political, and economic issues that can directly or indirectly affect society. Across mass, community, and small- and medium-sized outlets, it also educates and connects people, shapes public opinion, and gives whistleblowers a platform. Impartiality, truthfulness, and investigative rigor are among the principal pillars of its credibility. The most important red lines no media outlet should cross include the propagation of hatred in any form, racism, lies and defamation, deliberately false information, and violations of privacy and personal data. Core principles also include freedom of expression, pluralism, and fact-based reporting.

To date, no single body of international legislation governs the media. Countries and regions apply their own laws and regulations. Since World War II, many powerful countries have funded mainstream media outlets that primarily serve as tools for domestic and foreign-policy propaganda and narrative control. Some wealthy individuals and institutions have done the same to advance their own interests.

In some wealthy and powerful countries, domestic injustices and violations of human dignity are often overlooked, while political assassinations, bloody regime changes, covert subversive operations, denial of facts, and other harmful policies and practices carried out abroad against less powerful countries have been presented to the public as necessary responses to alleged “violations” of certain principles or rights.

In many cases, blatant falsehoods have been transformed into absolute truths, and unlawful acts of aggression have been whitewashed. Without diminishing the good work they have accomplished, these media networks bear responsibility for “justifying” many unjustifiable acts, resulting in countless deaths, material destruction, and shattered lives. The tragedy is that this continues: even when hundreds of journalists are brutally murdered, many mainstream media outlets still fail to denounce these misdeeds.

However, with the rise of the internet, mobile phones, social media, independent podcasters, alternative news networks, and other tools, timely information can now reach vast audiences instantly, while independent audio and video creators and hosts dig deeper to uncover facts. Anyone can capture a photo or video of an event and share it immediately on social media. Younger generations across continents seek facts about the past and present to build a better future. They consult historical archives and draw on multiple sources to form informed opinions on issues that matter to them. Of course, they are not immune to misinformation or malicious manipulation. Yet many people can find accurate information from well-informed alternative sources, even if those outlets lack the political backing and financial power of mainstream media organizations, which bear an even greater responsibility to speak the truth, especially when it matters most.

I Accuse the Religious Leaders

Religion may be understood as a divine philosophy through which God establishes principles intended to ensure harmonious, respectful, equitable, and peaceful living. It can also define the relationship between the Creator and the created, among human beings, and between humans and their environment. Some religions also outline political, economic, and scientific frameworks or rules. Scholars have long sought to explain the foundations of religious belief and have advanced testimonial, philosophical, and extraordinary arguments. Faith, however, is rooted in a profound qualitative appreciation of life and its meaning. Human values and dignity form important common ground among monotheistic, polytheistic, pantheistic, and atheistic convictions. Therefore, those who carry the banner of any belief bear a great responsibility to denounce violations of the principles they profess.

Over time, politics intruded into the sphere of faith and influenced decision-makers, business leaders, and society at large. Rulers often defined their own versions of particular beliefs. Divisions followed, and people of the same religion began killing one another in the name of God. Later, interfaith conflicts arose, leading to devastation and massacres.

One of the most despicable developments in recent human history was the initiation, expansion, and full implementation of the Doctrine of Discovery, through which faith became a justification for bigotry, discrimination, oppression, and expansionism, contributing to centuries of slave trading, gratuitous exploitation, and the devastation of the colonial era. Shamefully, some so-called scholars have characterized the decrees issued in this regard as “international law,” enabling the promulgation of appalling “codes,” political statements, and acts of violence. In the process, hundreds of millions of people were massacred, their treasures looted, and their capacity for self-defense crushed. In some parts of the world, native peoples were nearly erased. Serious crimes continue to be committed in the name of religion; yet, for various reasons, few leaders have come forward to say, “Not in our name!”

The intertwining of religion with politics and business has pulled faith away from its moral and social foundations and placed it in the service of those in power. In some cases, religious principles are invoked to sow division and violence among peoples.

Many faith leaders who persuade people to accept their teachings fail to demonstrate the moral courage and vision needed to take concrete action against injustices committed in the name of their beliefs and to oppose present-day misdeeds. They bear a heavy responsibility for the loss of innocent lives and for the world’s deteriorating condition.

Final Words

It is painful to witness dictatorships commit transgressions, but it is even more devastating to see “democratic societies” commit or condone similar acts. We may be approaching a major and extremely violent global calamity. Will the leaders mentioned in my four-part series of related articles realize they have strayed, take the needed corrective actions, or step aside and let younger, talented, and responsible generations take over and lead our world toward a more secure, promising, and prosperous future? If not, will the world’s youth launch a billion-signature vote-of-no-confidence petition to help save the planet and humanity?

Saber Azam is a former UN official. He is the author of Soraya: The Other Princess and Hell’s Mouth: A Journey to the Heart of West African Jungles. His third book, Nowhere to Go, will be published soon.

IPS UN Bureau

 

 

 

 

Excerpt:

This is the final article in a four-part series.

'The proposed Yavarí-Tapiche Corridor is home to Indigenous communities, including Indigenous Peoples living in voluntary isolation and initial contact, and 1.7 million hectares of intact tropical forest. The cross-border corridor is threatened by oil and gas, logging, and mining, as well as illegal activity.’ Credit: Earth Insight

By Juan Carlos Jintiach and M. Florencia Librizzi
ANTALYA, Türkiye, Nov 12 2026 (IPS)

The world cannot claim to protect the climate and nature while opening Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ territories to industrial activities that threaten their rights, livelihoods and ways of life. Yet governments increasingly recognize these communities’ contributions to climate and biodiversity protection while authorizing mining, oil drilling, industrial agriculture and infrastructure projects that can undermine the very territories they safeguard.

Last year, at COP30 in Belém, governments took an important step toward addressing the historical injustice of insecure land tenure. Through the Intergovernmental Land Tenure Commitment (ILTC),17 countries and one subnational government have now committed to advancing territorial rights across 160 million hectares by 2030: recognizing tenure across at least 80 million hectares and strengthening governance and protection across another 80 million hectares where rights are already recognized. A complementary $1.8 billion Forest and Land Tenure Pledge for 2026–2030 offers resources to support this work.

One year later, as governments gather for COP31 in Antalya, the challenge is to turn this landmark commitment into lasting territorial security.

For Indigenous Peoples, local communities and Afro-descendant Peoples, territories are inseparable from identity, culture, livelihoods, knowledge and, for many, spirituality and self-determination. Securing these rights, alongside recognizing and upholding the rights of nature, is fundamental to protecting both communities and the territories they have stewarded for generations.

Our new research shows that forests within established and proposed reserves for Indigenous Peoples in Isolation and Initial Contact (PIACI) in the Peruvian Amazon experienced 16 times less forest loss than forests outside these areas. Across the tropics, communities are recovering ancestral lands, exercising customary governance, monitoring threats, and restoring ecosystems. Their stewardship sustains biodiversity, carbon storage and water cycles essential to climate resilience.

Yet industrial pressures threaten these achievements. Our research has found that oil and gas blocks overlap approximately 31 million hectares of Indigenous and community territories in the Amazon Basin, while mining concessions overlap 18.7 million hectares in Mesoamerica. In the Congo Region, oil and gas blocks overlap 38% of mapped community forests and mining concessions 42%. In Indonesia, wood concessions overlap approximately 6 million hectares of Indigenous territories. These overlaps highlight potential conflicts between industrial development and territorial rights.

The proposed Yavarí-Tapiche Territorial Corridor illustrates what is at stake. This Indigenous-led initiative spans approximately 16 million hectares across Peru and Brazil, including territories of Indigenous Peoples in isolation and initial contact. Yet oil and gas blocks overlap approximately 10% of the proposed corridor, alongside logging and infrastructure pressures. Industrial development can affect entire watersheds, ecosystems and livelihoods through roads, pollution and habitat fragmentation.

From Recognition to Territorial Security

Legal recognition is a fundamental achievement and the foundation of territorial security. But rights recognized on paper must also be respected in practice. When energy, mining, infrastructure and investment decisions disregard rights-holders’ authority, the benefits of recognition can be undermined. The ILTC gives signatories an opportunity to align tenure recognition and governance with land-use planning, licensing, and investment decisions, while respecting the rights and priorities of affected peoples and communities.

Five Priorities for Action

First, accelerate recognition of Indigenous Peoples’, local communities’ and Afro-descendant Peoples’ territorial rights, including customary tenure. Recognition and restitution must respect rights-holders’ institutions, priorities and applicable human rights standards.

Second, strengthen governance and protection alongside recognition. Newly recognized and existing territories need sustained legal, institutional and financial support so rights-holders can exercise their authority, advance their priorities and protect their lands.

Third, align industrial licensing, infrastructure and investment with territorial rights. Governments must address conflicting concessions, qrespect territorial governance plans and fulfill applicable consultation and free, prior and informed consent obligations, including respecting rights-holders’ decisions to reject unwanted industrial activities.

Fourth, ensure financing reaches rights-holders. Governments and donors must provide direct, flexible and sustained funding for communities’ priorities, including governance, territorial protection, monitoring and sustainable economies.

Finally, measure more than hectares. Progress must reflect whether rights-holders can exercise their authority, industrial threats are addressed and financing reaches communities.

Delivering these priorities requires coordinated government action so that land, energy, mining, infrastructure and investment decisions reinforce territorial rights. Building on the leadership of Indigenous Peoples, local communities and Afro-descendant Peoples, the ILTC can help align policies and financing with their priorities. By 2030, success should be measured not only by hectares recognized, but by whether rights-holders can exercise their rights, govern their territories and determine their own futures free from extractive and large-scale industrial activities.

The commitment was made in Belém. Antalya is an opportunity to turn it into lasting territorial security.

Juan Carlos Jintiach is Executive Secretary, Global Alliance of Territorial Communities and M. Florencia Librizzi is Deputy Director, Earth Insight

IPS UN Bureau

 

 

 

 

Vous avez travaillé en France et vous vivez aujourd’hui en Algérie ? Vous pouvez demander votre retraite française sans prendre l’avion. À quel âge partir, […]

L’article Retraite française depuis l’Algérie : comment demander sa pension sans revenir en France est apparu en premier sur .