S-300V version Air Defence Vehicles shown after being eliminated by a strike.
Recently, Chinese and Philippine naval encounters have resulted in Chinese vessels ramming Philippine vessels in the waters between the two nations. The Philippines has always been one of the United States’ closest allies, and have always had a tight security arrangement with the United States. With wars already ranging in Europe and the Middle East, the last shoe to drop was always whether China would activate their forces regarding Taiwan, or if China would choose to avoid a conflict that had little practical benefit to them and their position in the world.
The events between the two nations is not simply a territorial spat, but involves all of the larger powers in the region and abroad, as it was influenced by actions abroad. Non-lethal assaults on a US ally by China may be a response to the US focusing diplomatically on China’s sale of non-military equipment to Russia that is likely being used in the production of Russian military equipment. While US allies and China could likely eliminate this tension by simply opening up sales of such affordable equipment toward the efforts to help Ukraine, this has not become an option to date. Actions by China likely surround a strategy to test the United States’ will power in helping its allies in foreign conflicts abroad. This ever present reality comes as the US Administration waffles in helping even their own citizens being held hostage while passively punishing the only forces equipped to ensure their freedom. If Americans will not even take direct actions to help their own people in dire straits, the opportunity to permanently damage the United States and their allies encourages the worst responses as a narrative, in political dealings and physically by way of open conflict. When the United States ignores their own citizens being tortured, it in effect dehumanizes them and shows to the world that human rights is no longer a core Western value. If some citizens simply don’t count, than all citizens are a target. While diplomacy always requires an outstretched arm, that arm must be always be connected to a strong hand.
While US allies do possess the strength to alter the political landscape abroad to their benefit and that of the US, the full weight of US power needs to be used in addressing conflicts so they do not escalate further. The deployment of US Naval assets in the Middle East recently likely is tamping down a larger military response in the region, but the lack of application to threats and open harm to the US and their allies has already lead to more losses in the conflict, ones that threaten to push conflicts into a more severe level. Support for Ukrainian forces entering Russia proper has been a bold show of strength, but it must be managed purposefully as a small incident in that operation could become the catalyst for an overwhelming response between nuclear powers. The lack of action against Russia’s external military support when many innocent lives of allies are being put in danger and American lives are being threatened internally is the driving factor behind China’s actions, and should be the most serious issue in the upcoming election as it will affect every since family for generations to come.
Live fire combat against defensive missile systems in Syria, and then in Russia/Ukraine has taught the US and its allies of the true capabilities of S-400 and other Russian air defense systems. Effectiveness of air defense systems against attacking missile systems is a key bit of information used by the US and China in measuring who would sustain the most losses in open conflict on the coast near Taiwan. While China’s Russian made TOR, S-300 and S-400 systems would perform well, it is now known how to defeat them during an assault. China’s large HQ-9 missile defense force along with other types would only be able to sustain a Chinese invasion of Taiwan if they could shield PLA forces from the many advance SM missiles of the US Navy, a task that is likely not possible in a wholly effective manner. The best defense therefore is a good offense, and that offense can only be successful by making their adversary weak from within before any open conflict can have a chance to be conducted. Every single conflict in the modern era begins with that one truth.
Tavaly októberben, amikor az amerikai légierő KC-10A Extender légi utántöltő és szállítógéppel felszerelt kontingense hazatért Szaúd-Arábiából, a US Air Force hivatalosan is bejelentette, hogy véget ért a típus utolsó hadműveleti bevetése és 43 éves üzemeltetés után, 2024 szeptemberében kivonják a szolgálatból.
A KC-10A Extender története az 1973. októberi arab-izraeli háborút követően kezdődött. Az Egyesült Államokból fegyverszállítmánnyal Izraelbe tartó C-141 Starlifter és C-5 Galaxy szállítógépek közül csak az utóbbi volt képes lerepülni a teljes távot, de csak a hasznos terhelés rovására teletöltött üzemanyagtartályokkal, a Starlifternek viszont szüksége volt egy közbenső leszállásra tankolás céljából. Egy ilyen technikai leszállás lehetősége mindig attól függ, hogy a kiszemelt ország engedélyezi-e. 1973-ban Portugália jóváhagyásával az amerikai szállítógépek az Azori-szigeteken tankolhattak. Az amerikai légierő ezután döntött egy olyan repülőgép beszerzéséről, amely a légi utántöltő képesség mellett - és nem annak rovására - nagyobb létszámú kontingenst és annak felszerelését is el tudja szállítani nagy távolságra, akár korlátozott méretű futópályával rendelkező repülőterekre is. A felhívás iránt az amerikai repülőgépgyártás két nagyágyúja, a Boeing és a McDonnell Douglas mutatott érdeklődést. A Boeing a 747-essel, az MDD a DC-10-30CF-fel vett részt a pályázaton. A Lockheed nem indult, pedig a DC-10-eshez hasonló L-1011 Tristar gépe néhány éve már kereskedelmi forgalomban állt. (Az amerikaihoz hasonló koncepció alapján, de szerényebb képességűre átépített Tristarok végül 1984-ben álltak szolgálatba a brit Royal Air Force-nál, ahol 2014-ig repültek.)
Ha az ardenneki csatára gondolunk, melynek helyszíneiről és emlékezetéről podcastunk 98. adásában közöltünk élménybeszámolót, a II. világháború egyéb nyugat-európai fejezetei közül - vagy ha akár egész Európát nézük, bár az oroszországi viszonyokkal ezen a téren nem vagyunk nagyon tisztában - kettő olyat tudunk bizonyosan említeni, amely felülmúlja azt emlékezetpolitikai jelentőségében: a Market Garden és az Overlord / D-Nap. Ezt figyelembe véve és pozitív belgiumi tapasztalatainkon felbuzdulva - ki hitte volna, hogy ezt a szóösszetételt egyszer így leírjuk - csapatunk arra vállalkozott, hogy az ottanihoz lényegében hasonló, de a harcok kerek, 80. évfordulójára időzített, és ennélfogva azért grandiózusabb normandiai rendezvénysorozaton teszi tiszteletét.
Since 25 June 2024, the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) have been engaging in accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova. The EU wants and needs to provide a strategic response to new geopolitical challenges, especially the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, it intends to accelerate already tough negotiations with the countries of the Western Balkans. Indeed, new proposals are aiming to gradually integrate candidate and acceding countries into specific policy areas of the EU. Accession negotiations regularly focus on these countries’ integration into the highly regulated European single market, and thus their adoption of the EU’s acquis communautaire with regard to the free movement of people, goods, services and capital. Whether the EU’s offer of these country’s gradual integration into the EU single market sparks momentum depends on how both sides weigh expected costs and benefits, and whether it is possible to develop concrete measures and timetables for implementation.
Le Festival du Cinéma Bulgare de Paris revient cet automne avec sa 6e édition au cinéma Le Grand Action du 10 au 13 septembre 2024.
Sous le thème « Plus forts ensemble », le programme riche et diversifié propose quatre séances exceptionnelles, dédiées au court métrage bulgare et aux coproductions internationales avec la Bulgarie.
Parmi les films projetés, nous aurons le plaisir de présenter, un film en collaboration avec La Fémis, deux œuvres primées au Festival de Cannes 2024, et un (…)
A coalition of human rights organizations has released an international statement during the 57th
session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, commending the decision by the President of the
United Arab Emirates (UAE) to grant pardon to Bangladeshi nationals who were accused and convicted
of crimes affecting security and public order, and sentenced for committing crimes and offenses
punishable by law. In their statement issued on Monday, September 9, 2024, the organizations
underscored that this pardon reflects the UAE’s long-standing humanitarian approach and reinforces
its adherence to the values of tolerance. The organizations further emphasized that this act of
clemency is a testament to the sound vision and leadership of the UAE’s government. The coalition,
led by the Union Association for Human Rights, is composed of more than 20 international, regional,
and national human rights organizations, including 9 organizations holding consultative status with
the United Nations.
In their international statement, issued alongside the opening of the Human Rights Council’s session
on Monday, the human rights NGOs commended the presidential pardon, which lifted the penalties
imposed on defendants and convicts in general, thereby facilitating their return to their homeland. The
NGOs lauded the UAE’s justice system and its commitment to the principles of fair and independent
legal proceedings. Furthermore, they praised the humane conditions and environment provided during
the period of detention and the execution of sentences, noting that these practices align with
international standards.
Within the same context, the human rights organizations, in their statement endorsed by twenty-one
organizations, expressed their appreciation for the national mechanisms responsible for implementing
the pardon issued by the President of the UAE. They commended the swift action taken by the UAE’s
Attorney General to execute the pardon, which involved suspending penalties and facilitating the
measures to ensure the return of defendants and convicts to their homeland. The organizations
emphasized the significance of this initiative in fostering peace, tolerance, and human coexistence –
values that the UAE is committed to promote across the globe. This approach, which has been central
to the UAE’s ethos since the era of the late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, and throughout its
civilizational and humanitarian journey, has been reaffirmed by the President of the UAE through the
issuance of this humanitarian amnesty decision for defendants and convicts, underscoring the nation’s dedication to promote tolerance and its adherence to noble human values and principles, as
consistently reflected in many national, regional and international stances, events and occasions.
In their international statement, the organizations commended the UAE for its commitment to
upholding and respecting the right to freedom of expression in accordance with the country’s laws and
regulations, ensuring its protection from any actions or deviations that could jeopardize national
security or harm the state’s interests and international relations. They called upon everyone to respect
states’ national laws, regulations and legislations, emphasizing the importance of adhering to their
legal frameworks and operational policies that align with international human rights law, which
stresses that freedom of expression must not infringe on the rights or reputations of others, nor
compromise national security, public order, public health, or public morals.
A deployable military facility to help counter improvised explosive devices (IEDs) is celebrating 10 years of operations in the Netherlands. First conceived during multinational land operations in Afghanistan, the Joint Deployable Exploitation and Analysis Laboratory (JDEAL) has trained more than 900 personnel from 14 European Union Member States. Now, the facility and its expertise could potentially be used in a much broader context, including Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) or Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV), in Ukraine or for any potential threat in Europe.
JDEAL, which has been managed by the European Defence Agency (EDA) and lead nation the Netherlands, also brings together Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania, Spain, and Sweden – as well as Norway. The United States, the United Kingdom, and the NATO Counter-IED Centre of Excellence have also sent observers over the project’s lifetime. JDEAL began operating in mid-2014.
JDEAL, which built on EDA’s temporary lab deployed to Kabul in September 2011, comprises a permanent joint training facility in the Dutch town of Soesterberg, and two deployable laboratories equipped with tools such as a Rapid DNA machine. They can be deployed on five days’ notice, either as a container or a tent, depending on conditions in the field.
The Netherlands is now donating one of the deployable laboratories to Ukraine and will partly finance the cost of its replacement to ensure two laboratories for the Member States once again.
Fit for new threatsAt a ceremony at JDEAL’s permanent technical exploitation training facility on 11 September 2024, Rear Admiral Ad van de Sande of the Royal Netherlands Navy said the project was a testament to what Member States can achieve together.
He urged countries to develop military capabilities and cooperation further to keep Europeans safe. “In the past 10 years, our geopolitical context has changed considerably. We have war in Europe. We are facing the most serious threats to global security in decades, and because of this, we are shifting from wars of choice to wars of necessity.”
He said the work of EDA was vital, citing the Agency’s work on the 2023 Capability Development Priorities (CDP). “Our transatlantic alliance is a cornerstone of European security. But Europe needs to take more responsibility. This means building credible deterrence and collective defence ... strengthening our position in NATO and fostering more European cooperation, with the help of the European Defence Agency,” van de Sande told the gathered military personnel and IED experts.
Paul Vos, Chairman of the JDEAL Management Committee, said the facility would need to keep innovating, and could be used to study aerial and possibly maritime IEDs to help protect against hostile drones. “Through JDEAL, we can potentially study radio techniques and frequencies used in UAVs, the types of explosives they carry, their chemical substances – and which country they come from.”
Giuseppe Dello Stritto, EDA’s Head of Unit for Land and Logistics at the Agency’s Capability Directorate, said that JDEAL needs to stay ahead of the challenges in a fast-changing operational environment. “Counter-IED has evolved as a threat, and our military capabilities and postures need to evolve as well. So JDEAL may need to be adapted.”
More information
CDP: qu-03-23-421-en-n-web.pdf (europa.eu)
JDEAL: Activities Search (europa.eu)
JDEAL in 2014: New facility to help in fight against IEDs opens in the Netherlands (europa.eu)
Die migrationsbezogene Kooperation mit Drittstaaten hat Konjunktur. Bilaterale Abkommen mit Herkunfts-, Aufnahme- und Transitstaaten gelten zunehmend als ein wichtiges Instrument zur Bewältigung der Herausforderungen, die mit Zuwanderung verbunden sind. Mit dem Sonderbevollmächtigten für Migrationsabkommen hat die Ampel-Regierung ein Amt geschaffen, das die politischen Zielsetzungen in den Bereichen Rückführung und Anwerbung in einem umfassenden Ansatz zusammenführen soll. In der Hoffnung auf eine klare innenpolitische Signalwirkung wurden zügig erste Vereinbarungen getroffen. Über ihren symbolischen Gehalt hinaus haben die Abkommen das Potential, nicht nur Ausgangspunkt für eine langfristig tragfähige migrationspolitische Kooperation zu sein, sondern auch zur Entwicklung der Herkunftsländer beizutragen. Um dieses Potential tatsächlich auszuschöpfen, bedarf es eines differenzierteren Interessenausgleichs zwischen den jeweiligen Partnerländern und Deutschland, eines Ausbaus der Anwerbungsstrukturen und einer Steigerung der Konsistenz in der externen Migrationspolitik.
A Kreatív Európa a 2021-2027 közötti időszakban az előző program három alappillérére, alprogramjára építve támogatja a kulturális és kreatív szektorokat:
A Kreatív Európa programról és a pályázati területekről bővebb információ érhető el a Funding & tender opportunities online felületen.
A Kreatív Európa program 2014-2020-as időszakának pályázatairól ITT tájékozódhat.
A támogatást nyert projektek megtekinthetők és részletes keresőfeltételek mellett böngészhetők a Creative Europe Project Results Platform online adatbázisában.
PrioritásokA Kreatív Európa célkitűzései a következők:
Ezek megvalósítása magában foglalja a kulturális és kreatív szervezetek, mozik, filmek támogatását.
A Kreatív Európa arra ösztönzi az audiovizuális, kulturális és kreatív szereplőket, hogy Európa-szerte működjenek, új közönségre találjanak és fejlesszék a digitális korban szükséges képességeiket. Az európai kulturális és audiovizuális alkotások új, külföldi közönséghez való eljuttatásával a program hozzájárul a kulturális és nyelvi sokszínűség biztosításához és védelméhez.
kreativeuropa.hu
A Kultúra ág segíti a kulturális és kreatív szervezetek transznacionális működését, támogatja a kulturális művek határokon átívelő áramlását és a kulturális szereplők mobilitását. Pénzügyi támogatást nyújt az európai dimenziójú kezdeményezéseknek, melyek célja a kulturális tartalom létrehozása és nemzetközi terjesztése, a nemzetközi mobilitás növelése, közönségfejlesztés, innováció és kapacitás-növelés (digitalizáció, új üzleti modellek, oktatás és képzés). A támogatott projektek célja, hogy biztosítsák a kulturális és kreatív szereplők nemzetközi működését.
A Kultúra ág által támogatott lehetőségek változatos tevékenységek keretében valósulnak meg:
HORIZONTÁLIS PROJEKTEKA Kultúra ág pályázatairól és támogatási lehetőségeiről ITT tájékozódhat.
kreativeuropa.hu