Feed aggregator

« Nous voulons aider les gens à rentrer chez eux, mais nous voulons nous assurer qu'ils le font en toute sécurité », a déclaré le chef de l'Organisation internationale pour les migrations de l'ONU dans une interview accordée à Euractiv.

The post INTERVIEW : La directrice de l’OIM exclut les « retours à grande échelle » en Syrie appeared first on Euractiv FR.

The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.

The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.

The integration of diverse knowledges is considered essential in ocean governance to understand and address the complex and transboundary changes affecting oceans and societies. In this line, also the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Development (2021–2030) calls for “the science we need for the ocean we want” (UNESCO, n.d.) and the 5th International Polar Year (2032–2033) evolves around “the urgent need for coordinated international research to tackle the biggest challenges of polar research, for both the Polar Regions themselves and for the world as a whole” (International Polar Year, n.d.). This thematic issue derives from the notion that the coordination and integration of diverse knowledges to develop advanced understandings is a political process shaped by, amongst other things, societal inequalities and different forms of governance. To assess the implication of this notion for the governance of the oceans—the “common heritage of humankind” (United Nations Law of the Sea)—this thematic issue explores knowledge integration processes in ocean governance. It sheds light on different governance formats, the role of participatory and co‐creative approaches to knowledge integration, their potentials, limitations, and related micropolitics.

AW "T"
Principes du droit communautaire
Avocat général Spielmann : une juridiction nationale est tenue d’écarter ou de considérer comme juridiquement inexistant l’arrêt d’une juridiction de rang supérieur qui ne satisfait pas à l’exigence d’un tribunal établi préalablement par la loi

AW "T"
Grundsätze des Gemeinschaftsrechts
Generalanwalt Spielmann: Ein nationales Gericht ist verpflichtet, ein Urteil eines höherrangigen Gerichts, das dem Erfordernis eines zuvor durch Gesetz errichteten Gerichts nicht genügt, unangewendet zu lassen oder als rechtlich inexistent anzusehen

AW "T"
Közösségi jogi elvek
Spielmann főtanácsnok: a nemzeti bíróság köteles figyelmen kívül hagyni vagy jogilag nemlétezőnek tekinteni egy magasabb szintű olyan bíróság ítéletét, amely nem felel meg a törvény által megelőzően létrehozott bíróság követelményének

AW "T"
Principles of Community law
Advocate General Spielmann: a national court is required to disregard, or find to be legally non-existent, the judgment of a higher court that does not meet the requirement of a tribunal previously established by law

A Kulturális és Innovációs Minisztérium, Magyarország Európai Unió melletti Állandó Képviselete és a Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal együttműködésében elkészült az EU következő kutatási keretprogramjára (FP10) vonatkozó magyar álláspont.

Alace
Espace de liberté, sécurité et justice

Protection internationale : selon l’avocat général Richard de la Tour, un État membre peut désigner des pays d’origine sûrs par un acte législatif et doit divulguer, à des fins de contrôle juridictionnel, les sources d’information qui fondent cette désignation

Alace
Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts
Internationaler Schutz: Nach Auffassung von Generalanwalt Richard de la Tour kann ein Mitgliedstaat durch einen Gesetzgebungsakt sichere Herkunftsstaaten bestimmen und muss zum Zweck einer gerichtlichen Kontrolle die Informationsquellen offenlegen, auf denen diese Bestimmung beruht

Alace
A szabadságon, a biztonságon és a jog érvényesülésén alapuló térség
International protection: according to Advocate General Richard de la Tour, a Member State may designate safe countries of origin by a legislative act and must disclose, for the purpose of judicial review, the sources of information upon which that designation is based

Alace
Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
International protection: according to Advocate General Richard de la Tour, a Member State may designate safe countries of origin by a legislative act and must disclose, for the purpose of judicial review, the sources of information upon which that designation is based

Hamoudi / Frontex
Droit institutionnel
Action en dommages et intérêts contre Frontex : l’avocat général Norkus analyse la répartition de la charge de la preuve en ce qui concerne l’existence d’un préjudice dans les affaires d’expulsions collectives

Hamoudi/ Frontex
Institutionelles Recht
Schadensersatzklage gegen Frontex: Generalanwalt Norkus analysiert die Verteilung der Beweislast in Bezug auf das Vorliegen eines Schadens in Fällen der Kollektivausweisung

Hamoudi kontra Frontex
Intézményi jog
Action for damages against Frontex: AG Norkus analyses the allocation of the burden of proof in relation to the existence of damage in collective expulsion cases

Hamoudi v Frontex
Law governing the institutions
Action for damages against Frontex: AG Norkus analyses the allocation of the burden of proof in relation to the existence of damage in collective expulsion cases

Belgischer Staat
Unionsbürgerschaft
Ein Drittstaatsangehöriger, der Elternteil eines Unionsbürgers ist, hat im Aufnahmemitgliedstaat ein abgeleitetes Recht auf Aufenthalt für mehr als drei Monate, sofern er nachweist, dass ihm sowohl in seinem Herkunftsland zu dem Zeitpunkt, als er dieses verlassen hat, als auch zu dem Zeitpunkt der Beantragung der Aufenthaltskarte von diesem Unionsbürger Unterhalt gewährt wird, wenn zwischen diesen beiden Zeitpunkten mehrere Jahre vergangen sind

belga állam
Uniós polgárság  
Az uniós polgár harmadik országbeli állampolgár szülőjét három hónapot meghaladó származékos tartózkodási jog illeti meg a fogadó tagállamban, amennyiben bizonyítja egyrészt azt, hogy származási országában e polgár eltartottja volt, amikor ezt az országot elhagyta, másrészt azt, hogy ő az említett polgár eltartottja tartózkodási kártya iránti kérelme benyújtásának időpontjában, amennyiben e két időpont között több év telt el

Belgian State
Citizenship of the Union
A third-country national who is the parent of a Union citizen enjoys a derived right of residence for more than three months in the host Member State if he or she proves, first, that he or she was dependent on that citizen in his country of origin on the date on which he or she left that country and, second, that he or she is dependent on that citizen on the date on which his or her application for a residence card was submitted, if several years have elapsed between those two dates