Photo of an assembly of members of the Lhaka Honhat indigenous association in the province of Salta, in northern Argentina. Their claim to their ancestral territory has been recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, but they have not yet gained exclusive use of their land. CREDIT: Courtesy of CELS
By Daniel Gutman
BUENOS AIRES, Mar 6 2023 (IPS)
In 1994 Argentina recognized in the constitution the ethnic and cultural pre-existence of indigenous peoples. However, enforcement of respect for their rights has fallen short and almost 30 years later the question of land is generating growing conflicts, which sometimes pit native communities against the rest of society.
On Feb. 5, a long convoy of some 500 vehicles driven by agricultural producers drove through the midwest province of Mendoza to defend “the sovereignty of our lands and private property” against growing and increasingly visible claims by indigenous people to their ancestral lands.
The demonstrators said that they do not want the same thing to happen in Mendoza as in the southern province of Río Negro, where there have been various violent incidents in recent years, which peaked in September 2022, when a group of indigenous people claiming their ancestral territory set fire to a National Gendarmerie mobile booth.“Due to economic interests over the land, we do not have a complete survey of indigenous territories in Argentina. That is the basic need, a diagnosis that is indispensable in order to solve this problem.”-- Noelia Garone
Meanwhile, the vast majority of the country’s indigenous communities are still waiting for community property title to the lands they have ancestrally lived on, which they point to as the key to access other rights that have remained empty words in the constitution, such as participation in the management of their natural resources.
“There is no political will to resolve this issue, because there are very powerful interests in the oil, mining, or agricultural industries that oppose it,” Silvina Ramírez, a member of the Association of Indigenous Rights Lawyers (AADI) and professor of graduate studies at the University of Buenos Aires, told IPS.
“This has been aggravated because there is a communication campaign trying to spread the idea that indigenous people want to prevent progress and are the enemy,” she added.
On the other side, Andrés Vavrik, a cattle producer from Mendoza and one of the organizers of the demonstration there, told IPS: “No one is against indigenous peoples, but we are concerned that the national government recognizes the right to territory of anyone who self-identifies as indigenous, because there we enter a very debatable terrain.”
“We came out to defend private property,” he said from the town of General Alvear in Mendoza.
A leading role in the march was played by a group of veterans of the Malvinas/Falklands Islands War, which Argentina lost in 1982 against the United Kingdom, which occupied the South Atlantic islands 190 years ago.
The reaction came after the National Institute of Indigenous Affairs (INAI), the official body in charge of the study and delimitation of indigenous territories, recognized the rights of native communities to over 21,500 hectares of land in Mendoza.
Although the INAI clarified that its resolution “does not imply in any way the restitution or handing over of land,” since the agency does not have that power, the Mendoza government objected to the decision before the Supreme Court.
More than 500 vehicles participated in a march in defense of national sovereignty in Mendoza, a province in central Argentina, which culminated in a demonstration in the city of Malargüe. The convoy was triggered by indigenous claims to their ancestral land in that province, to which agricultural producers are opposed. CREDIT: Courtesy of Diego Frutos
Land emergency
Argentina is a country that formally promoted European immigration and the exclusion of indigenous people since it became a unified nation in 1853.
In the 2010 census, 955,032 people self-identified as descendants of or belonging to indigenous peoples, just over two percent of the total population. In the 2022 census, which showed a population of 46 million inhabitants, the question was asked again, but the results have not yet been released.
Although the recognition of the rights of native communities in the 1994 constitutional reform was a landmark from a legal and symbolic point of view, implementation has been another question, with the issue of land ownership seen as the central hurdle.
For this reason, in 2006 Congress enacted Law 26160 on Emergency Matters of Land Possession and Ownership of indigenous communities, which banned evictions of native communities for four years, blocking existing court rulings ordering evictions.
The first three years were to be used to carry out a survey of the lands where indigenous communities lived and promote the issuing of collective land titles.
However, 17 years later the law is still in force, since it had to be extended several times, which demonstrates the failure of its implementation.
A photo of Kolla indigenous women in the extreme northern Argentine province of Jujuy. Although the rights of indigenous peoples have been recognized in the constitution since 1994, they have not been enforced. CREDIT: Courtesy of Amnesty International Argentina
The INAI completed surveys for only 46 percent of the legally constituted communities, as reported in late 2022. And today the road is much longer than before, because in 2007, when the communities started to register legally and the survey began, 950 registered, and the number has since grown to 1825.
But the survey does not imply that the land titling process is being carried out. This is an even more complicated step, because there is still no law in the country that regulates indigenous community property, which is different from the multi-owner residential development provided for under civil law, when there is more than one owner.
The community property law is another longstanding demand of indigenous peoples and human rights organizations, which Congress has not met.
Although some communities in the country have received their property title from the hands of provincial governments under different legal statuses, it is not known how many there are or what area these indigenous territories cover.
“The indigenous territorial emergency law was passed in a very particular context of expansion of the business of growing and exporting soybeans in Argentina, which caused a serious situation of constant evictions of indigenous communities,” Diego Morales, a lawyer with the Center for Legal and Social Studies (CELS), a human rights organization, told IPS.
“Since then, no government has wanted to hand over land to indigenous people and not even the associated communities in Lhaka Honhat (living in the province of Salta, in the north of the country) have been able to access a community property title and fully exercise their rights, even though they obtained a favorable sentence from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” he added.
Morales said the situation today is more difficult to resolve, because indigenous communities that have historically been discriminated against and neglected, who in recent years have become more aware of their rights, now not only lay claim to the land where they live but are also making cultural claims to territories from which their ancestors were driven.
A demonstration by indigenous Kolla people in the arid, mountainous landscape of northwestern Argentina. The country has declared a “territorial emergency” for indigenous peoples since 2006, but the vast majority of communities do not have title to their lands. CREDIT: Courtesy of Endepa
Violence and debate
Diego Frutos, who suffered several occupations and attacks on his property in Villa Mascardi, in the province of Río Negro, by groups laying claim to his property for Mapuche indigenous communities, said there are people who are trying to take advantage of indigenous rights to reclaim land that does not belong to them.
“I do not deny the rights of the Mapuches, but those who attacked my property are not a registered community. They cannot be, because they do not have blood ties and they cannot show that they have had an uninterrupted occupation of a territory. They are a group of young people who seek to take advantage of the umbrella of indigenous rights,” Frutos told IPS from his town.
Frutos is convinced that those who attacked his property are backed by the administration of center-left President Alberto Fernández, who feels pressure from both sides while walking a minefield between indigenous people and the agricultural producers who settled on their lands, with neither side feeling satisfied with what his government has done.
Sandra Ceballos, a member of the Kolla people and vice president of AADI, the association of lawyers for indigenous rights, told IPS that the government is persecuting indigenous people, as demonstrated by the fact that an unusual joint command of federal and provincial forces was assembled in Río Negro, after the acts of violence in September.
Noelia Garone, a lawyer from the Argentine office of Amnesty International, said the lack of recognition of the right to land has triggered multiple violations of other rights of indigenous communities, such as education, healthcare, water or work.
“Due to economic interests over the land, we do not have a complete survey of indigenous territories in Argentina. That is the basic need, a diagnosis that is indispensable in order to solve this problem,” she told IPS.
Related ArticlesA vasárnapi német lap a jobbközép CDU/CSU pártszövetség szövetségi parlamenti frakciójának írásbeli kérdésére adott kormányzati választ idézve azt írta, hogy 2022-ben 12 945 hazatelepítést hajtottak végre, és 23 337 esetben zárult eredménytelenül a művelet.
A végre nem hajtott hazatelepítések szinte mindegyike – 22 408 eset – már azelőtt meghiúsult, hogy az előkészítésért felelős tartományi rendőrség átadta volna az elutasított menedékkérőt vagy menedékkérőket a hazaszállítást intéző szövetségi rendőrségnek.
Ennek számos oka lehet. A leggyakoribb az, hogy a hazatelepítendő embereket nem találják meg a lakóhelyükön, a kormányzati kimutatás alapján 6971 esetben zárták le az eljárást eredménytelenül azért, mert a tartományi szervek nem tudták elszállítani az illetőt a kijelölt repülőtérre.
A Welt am Sonntag értesülése szerint az is gyakori, hogy törlik az adott járatot. Így például az Ukrajna elleni orosz támadás következtében nemcsak az oroszországi és ukrajnai, hanem a moldovai repülőterekre sem indítanak gépeket Németországból, Olaszország pedig 2022 decemberében egyik napról a másikra leállította az Olaszországból Németországba vándorolt és ott elutasított menedékkérők visszavételét.
Előfordul az is, hogy az elutasított menedékkérők hazájának hatóságai tagadják meg a visszafogadást, így nem tudnak elindulni például csoportos hazaszállításra szervezett charterjáratok. Ilyen esetekről számoltak be hazatelepítéssel foglalkozó tisztségviselők a Welt am Sonntagnak a többi között Nigériával és Irakkal kapcsolatban.
A lap a Hessen tartományi belügyminisztérium adatait idézve hozzátette, hogy egy sor országba, Afganisztánba, Irakba, Iránba, Marokkóba, Szíriába és Szomáliába szinte egyáltalán nem, vagy legfeljebb kivételes, egyedi esetekben lehetséges hazatelepíteni elutasított menedékkérőket. A Hessenben nyilvántartott 18 ezer elutasított menedékkérő közül nyolcezren származnak ebből az országcsoportból.
A Welt am Sonntag értesülése szerint számos művelet akkor hiúsul meg, amikor a hazatelepítendő embert már sikerült kiszállítani a repülőtérre és átadni a szövetségi rendőrségnek, és az illető hazája sem akadályozza az eljárást. Ezek közül 256 esetben az illető fizikai ellenállása miatt volt eredménytelen a művelet, 206 esetben a repülőgép kapitánya nem volt hajlandó elszállítani az illetőt, 90 esetben egészségi gondok léptek fel, 43-szor pedig a hazatelepítésre jelölt illető az utolsó pillanatban bírósági úton érte el az eljárás leállítását – ismertette a lap a CDU/CSU frakciójának megküldött kimutatást.
A Welt am Sonntag hozzátette, hogy az elutasított menedékkérők és a bűncselekmény miatt távozásra kötelezett külföldiek számához képest hagyományosan alacsony az eredményes hazatelepítések száma Németországban. A legsikeresebb év 1994 volt, amikor 53 043 eljárást zártak le eredményesen. Azóta ez a szám rendre jóval kisebb, a koronavírus-világjárvány első évében, 2020-ban például csupán 10 800 hazatelepítést hajtottak végre.
The post Az elutasított menedékkérők hazatelepítése kétharmada sikertelen Németországban appeared first on .
Azt az ajánlatot tettem a fiataloknak, hogy lépjünk szövetségbe, csatlakozzanak egy olyan haderőhöz amely a bátrak hadereje – mondta Szalay-Bobrovniczky Kristóf honvédelmi miniszter a Facebookon közzétett videóban.A miniszter hangsúlyozta: a magyar haderő eszközrendszerében is megújul: új szárazföldi eszközök, új légvédelmi és légierős eszközök érkeznek.
„Arra kértem a magyar fiatalokat, abba a szövetségbe hívtam őket, hogy csatlakozzanak egy olyan közösséghez, amely adja az összetartozás örömét, a kiképzettség önbizalmát, az életen át tartó barátokat, társítva egy nagyon komoly és versenyképes juttatási rendszerrel. Várunk mindenkit a magyar hadseregbe, mert mi készen állunk. Te is készen állsz?” – fogalmazott a miniszter a videóban. Hozzátette: ez a nemzet ezer éve itt él a Kárpátokban, és nemzeti erényünk, a bátorság példáját mutatta sok száz éven keresztül.
Nyitrai Zsolt, a miniszterelnök főtanácsadója a videóban arról beszélt, hogy a Magyar Honvédségnél elkezdődött a fiatalítás, várják a friss erőt, éppen ezért egy egész éves, elsősorban a fiatalokat toborzó kampányba kezdenek.
Míg a baloldal leépítette a haderőt, addig Magyarország mostani kormánya megbecsüli a katonákat és modern hadsereget épít. Ez különösen fontos, hiszen a veszélyek korát éljük, a szomszédunkban háború dúl, a békéhez pedig erő kell – tette hozzá Nyitrai.
The post Szalay-Bobrovniczky szövetséget ajánl a fiataloknak appeared first on .