On 5 June 2016, the former Conservative Prime Minister appeared on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show and accused the Leave campaign of being “fundamentally dishonest” and “verging on the squalid.”
He warned that the public was being fed “a whole galaxy of inaccurate and frankly untrue information.” He was angry. Rightly so.
John Major called out the key flaw at the heart of the Brexit campaign: it was all promise, no plan.
“What they have NOT done is to tell us what would be the position if we were to vote to leave.”
That line rings louder with each passing year.
He dismissed claims that Brexit would boost jobs and trade as pure fantasy. “We would lose a huge amount in terms of national income through trade,” he said – because UK businesses would sell less to the EU’s Single Market.
He foresaw the damage. He foresaw the deceit. And he made it clear who would suffer most:
“the everyday man and woman in the street.”
John Major wasn’t alone. Many of those who understood how the EU works tried to sound the alarm. But the truth was drowned out by slogans and misinformation – and by Brexiters who refused to say what would happen if they won.
And now? Everything he warned of has happened – and worse. There’s been no trade boom, only red tape. No £350 million a week for the NHS, just staff shortages and collapsing services. And far from taking back control, the UK is isolated, its influence diminished.
The post John Major saw the lies of Brexit – and told us appeared first on Ideas on Europe.
Following the EU-UK summit last month, I’ve finally got my ducks in a row on trying to track the substance of what follows.
You’ll recall that apart from the Security & Defence Partnership, there was not a single definitive legal instrument. Instead, there was lots of language about ‘working towards’ things or ‘exploring possibilities’: all very nice, but not really enough in an era of questions about the depth of international commitments.
Hence the tracker. As I’ve noted in my Bluesky thread on this, I’m only tracking those elements that seem to produce a formal agreement between the parties: potentially the list could grow, but let’s wait and see.
Rob Francis has written that Commission mandates for SPS, ETS linkage and Youth Experience aren’t coming until the autumn of this year, so formal negotiations seem unlikely until the back end of 2025. Given that each of these could throw up a bunch of issues (such as how much the UK is prepared to accept EU rules, and how much this is going to cost in contributions), reaching an agreement on any of these by the time of next spring’s summit looks hopeful.
Hence the tracker covers the entire lifetime of this Parliament.
Of course, if polls continue to be as unclear as now, the shadow of a non-Labour government is liable to cast a shadow on any negotiations from about 2027 onwards (given the time it’ll take to conclude, ratify and implement any individual deals), so this is the best opportunity for both sides to nail things down and minimise the chance of new administrations making bold choices.
As for the rest of the list, I’ve seen nothing to indicate timelines. Even if most of it is highly technical, it’ll still need work and political attention, something that’s been in short supply so far.
So the big question is whether long-term incentives will outweigh short-term distraction.
PDF: https://bit.ly/UshGraphic141
The post Tracking the UK-EU reset appeared first on Ideas on Europe.