jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("#isloaderfor-odigrm").fadeOut(2000, function () { jQuery(".pagwrap-odigrm").fadeIn(1000);});});
The International Peace Institute (IPI) held a thronged farewell reception on December 15, 2016 for outgoing Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who responded by saying, “Even though I am leaving, my heart will never leave the United Nations. I will always be with you.”
Mr. Ban took the occasion to praise his successor, Secretary-General–designate António Guterres, also an honored guest at the IPI event, as someone particularly well equipped for the job. He said he had been reviewing the careers of some past secretaries-general and reasoned that Mr. Guterres, a former prime minister of Portugal and UN High Commissioner for Refugees, would be beginning with a distinct earned advantage.
“I was a complete outsider when I came here, a complete outsider,” Mr. Ban said. “Kofi Annan has been the complete insider. Guterres is a complete outsider, but he has longer than 10 years’ experience inside the UN. It would be very difficult to find someone who is combining both the qualities of insider and outsider.”
Consequently, he predicted, “he will be able to deliver.”
He also lauded the manner in which Mr. Guterres had been selected. “For the first time in UN history, we had an open SG process,” he noted. His reference was to the requirements for formal nominations, mission statements and open hearings in the General Assembly that were instituted this year. As a result, Mr. Ban said, the Security Council was able to make “the best choice” for the new secretary-general.
With Mr. Guterres standing by his side, Mr. Ban said he had profited from advice and critiques from IPI and other close observers of the UN and urged the crowd to “please make him accountable. He said that by the end of his term, there will be 50% gender parity. Please make sure that he is able to deliver what you really want.”
Saying he was particularly aggrieved at not having been able to secure peace in the Middle East, he told Mr. Guterres, “I’m certain I’m leaving this Middle East peace process, I hope I’m not giving you too much homework.”
In opening remarks, IPI President Terje Rød-Larsen introduced Mr. Ban as “a man who is humble, gracious, patient, and thoughtful, and who has committed his life to public service and who truly believes that no one should be left behind.”
He singled out his achievements like the adoption of the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development—“a historic agenda that integrates the three founding pillars of the UN: peace and security, human rights and development”—his “tireless” effort to put climate change at the forefront of the global agenda, resulting in the historic Paris Agreement, and his “receptiveness to new ideas for change and his openness to thoughtful analysis.”
“Thank you,” Mr. Rød- Larsen concluded, for “having taken on ‘the most difficult job in the world’ and for being a symbol of hope to people across the globe.”
The IPI President also thanked Mr. Ban for having served for the past 10 years as the honorary chair of IPI and announced that Mr. Guterres would succeed him in that role.
Se ha llegado al Consejo Europeo de diciembre de 2016 con una Estrategia Global de Política Exterior y de Seguridad de la UE y con una agenda para implementarla. Ha llegado el momento de plantearse por qué los presupuestos de la Unión no asumen el pago de su defensa.
Sorry, this entry is only available in Ελληνικά.
Les auditeurs de la 2ème session « Enjeux et stratégies maritimes » se sont rendus à Brest et Lorient les 9 et 10 décembre. Dans le cadre d’une visite du Service hydrographique ...
¿Cómo ha transcurrido la crisis política portuguesa y cuál ha sido el balance de un año de gobernabilidad? ¿Qué perspectivas de futuro hay en un sistema de gobierno tan original?
Die vorliegende Studie setzt sich mit den kommerziellen, wirtschaftlichen, regulatorischen und politischen Implikationen auseinander, die das Nord-Stream-2-Projekt mit sich bringt. Die Planungen für den Bau eines dritten und vierten Strangs der Nord-Stream-Pipeline durch die Ostsee haben in der Europäischen Union erhebliche Kontroversen ausgelöst. Das Pipeline-Projekt zieht hohe politische Kosten nach sich und das fast unabhängig davon, ob es scheitert oder implementiert wird, denn es berührt die Interessenlagen vieler Akteurinnen und Akteure empfindlich. Nord Stream ist eine kommerzielle Unternehmung, hat aber weit über das Betriebs- und Energiewirtschaftliche hinausreichende Folgen, die sich für die einzelnen EU-Staaten sehr unterschiedlich darstellen. In jedem Fall also bedeutet das Vorhaben eine Herausforderung für die Energiediplomatie nach innen und nach außen. Es geht darum, die möglichen Spaltungseffekte des Projekts für die europäische Energiepolitik und die Energieunion einzudämmen und abzupuffern.
Die vorliegende Studie setzt sich mit den kommerziellen, wirtschaftlichen, regulatorischen und politischen Implikationen auseinander, die das Nord-Stream-2-Projekt mit sich bringt. Die Planungen für den Bau eines dritten und vierten Strangs der Nord-Stream-Pipeline durch die Ostsee haben in der Europäischen Union erhebliche Kontroversen ausgelöst. Das Pipeline-Projekt zieht hohe politische Kosten nach sich und das fast unabhängig davon, ob es scheitert oder implementiert wird, denn es berührt die Interessenlagen vieler Akteurinnen und Akteure empfindlich. Nord Stream ist eine kommerzielle Unternehmung, hat aber weit über das Betriebs- und Energiewirtschaftliche hinausreichende Folgen, die sich für die einzelnen EU-Staaten sehr unterschiedlich darstellen. In jedem Fall also bedeutet das Vorhaben eine Herausforderung für die Energiediplomatie nach innen und nach außen. Es geht darum, die möglichen Spaltungseffekte des Projekts für die europäische Energiepolitik und die Energieunion einzudämmen und abzupuffern.
jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery("#isloaderfor-jpomvz").fadeOut(2000, function () { jQuery(".pagwrap-jpomvz").fadeIn(1000);});});
“Sustaining Peace in an Urban World” was the subject of a series of four panels ranging across challenges that urban environments present for UN activities, on December 14, 2016, at the UN Headquarters in New York.
Explaining the sessions’ purpose, Jimena Leiva-Roesch, Policy Analyst at the International Peace Institute (IPI)—one of the organizations co-sponsoring the event—said that, “What we’re trying to do here is embed principles in UN Charter that are now in the 2030 Agenda and in the Sustaining Peace Agenda in cities throughout world.”
She posed a few questions for consideration. “Can cities of today and the future offer sanctuary for those seeking protection? Hubs for political, economic inclusivity? Magnets attracting young to study and learn? Can they remain open to offer welcome to strangers from a long journey?”
Izumi Nakamitsu, Assistant Secretary-General, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), said that a new approach must be designed which reaches beyond the UN system.
People working in the UN “have a tendency to think the UN is center of the world,” she said. “This is not the case. We need to reinforce national and local authorities, and partner with civil society.”
Yu Ping Chan, Special Policy Advisor, UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), suggested ways to take up the call “to get out of the UN bubble.” She said member-states and civil society must “look for more effective partnerships beyond the UN,” in order to “forge a global partnership of entities and stakeholders.”
Sarah Cliffe, Director of the NYU Center on International Cooperation (NYU-CIC), suggested the UN look to Africa, where an unprecedentedly fast pace of urbanization has been met with a “very consistent pattern in successfully reducing violence by using partnerships with civil society and municipalities.”
She encouraged the UN to partner with local actors, rather than impose a program, based on the African example. This success “would never have been achieved through a top-down approach,” she said.
Malkit Shoshan, Founder of the architectural think tank Foundation for Achieving Seamless Territory (FAST), emphasized the need to design UN bases to make them more compatible with urban areas and populations. “UN bases are engineered based on strict factional requirements, resulting in bases that sustain only the mission and its forces. How can the UN better advocate for sustaining peace when it builds bases without considering local context?” she asked.
Design and urban planning should be part of the mission planning conversation, as new structures can have disruptive effects, she said. “Bringing new structures into conflict-ridden cities disturbs the circulation of the city, collapses markets, and pollutes the ground. At the end of the mission, you’re left with rubble. Structures can be turned around if the UN reforms their planning process.”
However, just better design is not enough, Michael Sorkin, President, Terreform, indicated, continuing on the urban planning theme. “Cities are juxtaposition engines. Good cities are those that strike a balance between planned and accidental encounters,” he said.
Deen Sharp, Principal Researcher, Terreform Urban Research, said that better planning is about more than substituting municipalities for national actors. “We don’t necessarily just want a simple shift from engagement of state actors to municipal,” he said. “When you get at the municipal level, there are many levels of governance that intertwine. It is vastly complex.”
The event was hosted by the Permanent Missions of Australia and the Netherlands to the UN.
Deputy Permanent Representative of Australia, Caitlin Wilson, delivered opening remarks and Deputy Permanent Representative of the Netherlands, Lise Gregoire, delivered closing remarks.
The event was co-organized with UN Peacebuilding, UN Habitat, the Global Alliance for Urban Crises, Terreform, and NYU-CIC.
Ms. Leiva-Roesch and Gizem Sucuoglu of NYU-CIC moderated the panels.