Alors que l’aide publique au développement fait face à une contraction sans précédent, entre coupes budgétaires annoncées, montée des urgences humanitaires et aggravation des crises de la dette, les débats sur son efficacité se réactivent. Depuis vingt ans, les réformes impulsées par la Déclaration de Paris ont profondément transformé les pratiques : aide plus ciblée, projets évalués, redevabilité accrue et partenariat renforcé avec les pays récipiendaires. Pourtant, la baisse des financements menace ces acquis, au moment même où les besoins structurels (éducation, santé, adaptation climatique) n’ont jamais été aussi élevés. Entre impératifs de court terme, risques de dépendance, fragilité institutionnelle et arbitrages imposés par le surendettement, un dilemme se pose : comment préserver une aide efficace, soutenable et tournée vers le long terme, lorsque les moyens se réduisent, que les urgences s’accumulent et que les créanciers privés jouent un rôle grandissant dans les négociations ?
À téléchargerL’article L’aide publique au développement : à la recherche de durabilité et d’efficacité dans un contexte de crises multiples est apparu en premier sur IRIS.
One of the hallmarks of colonization was transplantation of the European nation-state to the colonies in line with colonialism’s consideration of sedentarism as indispensable to its ‘civilization’ by domination mission. The structuring of space and belonging around the Eurocentric notion of nationhood and statehood became the vehicle through which populations in the colonized parts of the world were reconfigured as insiders and outsiders as well as legal and illegal among other designations. This chapter addresses the Eurocentric configuration of space around the nation-state, its reproduction in the colony and post-colony and the implications for contemporary global mobility. Building on Michel Foucault’s (1986) heterotopic spaces and Freerk Boedeltje’s (2012) discussion of the structuring of space around the ‘normal’/‘deviant’ binary, the chapter argues that this dichotomous dissection of space inscribes varied texts on mobile bodies and creates hierarchies that bestow varied identities and differential mobility opportunities on people who inhabit different spaces. The Eurocentric structuring of space construes mobility as anomalous and straining the hyphen in nation-state through its disruption of the order created around sedentarism and spatial demarcation of belonging. The chapter highlights how the nation-state attaches belonging to space in ways that restrain mobility particularly by ‘othered’ bodies from ‘deviant’ spaces. It illustrates its main argument by discussing the tethering of belonging to space exemplified by physical and legal barriers buttressed by securitizing discourses that seek to deter presumably transgressive mobilities’ ‘encroachment’ into spaces where they are ostensibly anomalous.
One of the hallmarks of colonization was transplantation of the European nation-state to the colonies in line with colonialism’s consideration of sedentarism as indispensable to its ‘civilization’ by domination mission. The structuring of space and belonging around the Eurocentric notion of nationhood and statehood became the vehicle through which populations in the colonized parts of the world were reconfigured as insiders and outsiders as well as legal and illegal among other designations. This chapter addresses the Eurocentric configuration of space around the nation-state, its reproduction in the colony and post-colony and the implications for contemporary global mobility. Building on Michel Foucault’s (1986) heterotopic spaces and Freerk Boedeltje’s (2012) discussion of the structuring of space around the ‘normal’/‘deviant’ binary, the chapter argues that this dichotomous dissection of space inscribes varied texts on mobile bodies and creates hierarchies that bestow varied identities and differential mobility opportunities on people who inhabit different spaces. The Eurocentric structuring of space construes mobility as anomalous and straining the hyphen in nation-state through its disruption of the order created around sedentarism and spatial demarcation of belonging. The chapter highlights how the nation-state attaches belonging to space in ways that restrain mobility particularly by ‘othered’ bodies from ‘deviant’ spaces. It illustrates its main argument by discussing the tethering of belonging to space exemplified by physical and legal barriers buttressed by securitizing discourses that seek to deter presumably transgressive mobilities’ ‘encroachment’ into spaces where they are ostensibly anomalous.
One of the hallmarks of colonization was transplantation of the European nation-state to the colonies in line with colonialism’s consideration of sedentarism as indispensable to its ‘civilization’ by domination mission. The structuring of space and belonging around the Eurocentric notion of nationhood and statehood became the vehicle through which populations in the colonized parts of the world were reconfigured as insiders and outsiders as well as legal and illegal among other designations. This chapter addresses the Eurocentric configuration of space around the nation-state, its reproduction in the colony and post-colony and the implications for contemporary global mobility. Building on Michel Foucault’s (1986) heterotopic spaces and Freerk Boedeltje’s (2012) discussion of the structuring of space around the ‘normal’/‘deviant’ binary, the chapter argues that this dichotomous dissection of space inscribes varied texts on mobile bodies and creates hierarchies that bestow varied identities and differential mobility opportunities on people who inhabit different spaces. The Eurocentric structuring of space construes mobility as anomalous and straining the hyphen in nation-state through its disruption of the order created around sedentarism and spatial demarcation of belonging. The chapter highlights how the nation-state attaches belonging to space in ways that restrain mobility particularly by ‘othered’ bodies from ‘deviant’ spaces. It illustrates its main argument by discussing the tethering of belonging to space exemplified by physical and legal barriers buttressed by securitizing discourses that seek to deter presumably transgressive mobilities’ ‘encroachment’ into spaces where they are ostensibly anomalous.
Mátrafüredet elhagyva és a 24-es úton tovább autózva, jó időben már messziről látszik az a haditechnikai gyűjtemény, amely egy volt kőbánya területén létesült kalandpark egyik látnivalója. A járművekből, tüzérségi eszközökből, és repülőgépekből álló kiállítás 2015-ben került jelenlegi helyére, és sorsuk az, ami a legtöbb szabadtéren kiállított eszközé: amelyik nem kap folyamatos állagmegóvást, azon a csapadék és a napsugárzás az évek múlásával könyörtelenül otthagyja a nyomát. Persze igazságtalan lenne azt állítani, hogy csupa lepusztult eszköz parkol az egykori kőbányában, mert akadnak szép állapotú darabok is, és verőfényes napsütésben bizonyára vigasztalóbb lenne a látvány, mint az olyan esős, ködös időben, amikor az alábbi képek készültek.
Igor Alignon Boco, élu sur la liste du parti Union progressiste le renouveau (UP-R) aux élections communales du 11 janvier 2026, vient d'être nommé au cabinet du président de l'Assembléenationale. Cette nomination intervient
après sa démission lors de la première session ordinaire de l'année 2026 du conseil communal de Godomey.
Une première démission au sein du conseil communal d'Abomey-Calavi. Le chef d'arrondissement de Godomey, Igor Alognon, élu au terme des élections communales du 11 janvier 2026, ne siègera pas à la municipalité d'Abomey-Calavi. Il l'a annoncé lors des travaux de la première session ordinaire de l'année 2026, tenue à Godomey le lundi 9 février dernier.
Mais aux dernières nouvelles, le désormais ex CA de Godomey est promu au poste d'assistant du président de l'Assemblée nationale, Joseph Djogbénou. Sa nomination selon des sources concordantes, a été prononcée ce mercredi 11 février 2026.
Désormais absent au conseil communal, il sera remplacé par son suppléant, Nathanaël Koty.
F. A. A.