Africa

Pour recevoir et donner des ordres, envoyer un compte rendu, connaître la position des unités amies… Les transmissions sont essentielles. Et elles le sont davantage aujourd’hui avec les exigences du combat collaboratif. Alors qu’elle met déjà en œuvre les radios CONTACT, le Système d’information du combat SCORPION [SICS] et les stations terrestres pour les satellites...

Cet article L’armée de Terre est en quête de 14 000 radios individuelles pour ses combattants débarqués est apparu en premier sur Zone Militaire.

Le dollar américain est la devise la plus échangée au monde, même s'il n'est pas la devise la plus forte au niveau mondial (cette place revient actuellement au dinar koweïtien).

South Africa's sports minister Gayton McKenzie says "no formal decision" has been taken to relocate the 2026 Women's Africa Cup of Nations away from Morocco.

Hunger shadowed Mercy Lung’aho’s childhood, fueling her campaign to promote nutrition as a foundation for Africa’s development. As lead for the Food Security, Nutrition and Health Program at the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), this certified nutritionist and researcher, with more than 20 years of championing development, is advocating for an integrated approach combining […]

President Donald Trump Joins Faith Leaders in Prayer – Credit: The White House
 
According to the UN, Sunday marked the start of World Interfaith Harmony Week, a time to emphasize that mutual understanding and interreligious dialogue are essential to building a culture of peace. The week was established to promote harmony among all people, regardless of their faith.

By Azza Karam
NEW YORK, Feb 2 2026 (IPS)

Several events, meetings, consultations, initiatives, etc. taking place among faith-inspired, ‘faith-based’ and a variety of other similar efforts, over the past year, in the United States especially, concern me.

Coming from a background of human rights, international development, and humanitarian service, I have witnessed the arc of ‘none’ to increasing interest by Western governments in ‘religion’ – religious engagement, religion and development, religion and foreign policy, religious freedom, religious peacebuilding, or religion and peace, and more, including even religion and agriculture. Basically, religion and everything.

Non-Western governments within Africa and Asia, including areas overlapping with what we call (variably) “the Middle East”, have long been interested, and indeed actively engaging religious leaders and religious institutions.

As many scholars, observers, and foreign policy pundits have noted, the interest of such governments has often transcended any genuine fascination with faith, towards rather obvious instrumentalization of religious leaders, religious organisations and religious groups, in support of specific political agendas (e.g., making peace with Israel, legitimacy of corrupt – and violent – politically repressive leaders and regimes, etc.).

In fact, the marriage between select religious leaders/institutions/groups and some political actors goes back to the empires we have inherited pre-Westphalian states).

I recall some stories from my time serving as a staff member at the United Nations, and in other international fora. The first story revolves around one Arab and one Indian diplomat speaking with a European counterpart, during one of several UN Strategic Learning Exchanges on Religion, Development and Diplomacy, which I coordinated and facilitated, this one in 2014.

The discussion concerned how best to “benefit” from working with religious leaders to affirm a message of certain political parties, especially, albeit not only, around elections. The Arab patted the European on the back and said, with a smile and a wink: “you are finally catching up on how to use these religious leaders – congratulations my friend”. The Indian one, looking bemused, added “Yes. And be careful”.

Another story concerns another meeting I organised – in one of the basement meeting rooms of the UN – between UN officials and a diverse array of religious actors, around peace and mediation efforts, in select African and Asian conflict settings, early 2015.

A European Christian religious leader of a renowned multi-religious organisation made an intervention to address the concerns about “instrumentalization” of religious actors, which some faith-based NGO leaders were articulating.

While some faith representatives cautioned against religious actors being used to “rubber stamp decisions already made by governments and some intergovernmental organisations” (in the room were both UN and EU officials), this particular Western Christian religious leader spoke up and said, “I am not worried about that at all, in fact, I would like to say to my secular colleagues in this room, please use us… we can certainly benefit you… we are not common civil society actors, our mission makes us exceptional”.

My last story, is from my time serving as the secretary general of an international multireligious organisation which convenes religious leaders from diverse religious institutions around “deeply held and widely shared values”.

As soon as I became a member of the UN Secretary-General’s High Level Advisory Board on Effective Multilateralism, I arranged a meeting between some of my multi-religious Board members (religious leaders), and some members of this high Level UN SG’s Advisory Board.

The idea was to nurture a quiet but candid dialogue between pollical and religious leaders, around why and how multilateralism can be significantly strengthened by multireligious engagement.

I hasten to note that multireligious engagement, if served well, can be – as I have written and persistently argued – resistant to instrumentalization of select religious actors to serve any one particular governmental agenda. The latter is a feature I warn against, and small wonder, given developments from India to the United States, from Russia to Israel, and beyond.

Once again, I heard a religious leader invite the members of the SG’s Board to “use” their (religious) wisdom because of their “exceptional” mission (presumably the godly one). This time, later reflection among members of the UN SG Board led to noting that such multireligious engagement would be inadvisable, due to a concern about “Muslims” involved in such multireligious spaces.

Fast forward to 2026, one year after an increasingly belligerent US Presidential Administration’s record, which includes relatively ‘minor’ policy decisions such as transforming the name of the Ministry of Defence to the “Ministry of War”. And not so minor human rights abuses of citizens and immigrants, and some pointing to manipulation and outright disregard of the rule of law, both at home and abroad (I hope this is polite enough wording). Of course one dares not mention support to certain genocidal regimes killing thousands in the name of self-protection.

In this environment, I listen to conversations among some of the United States’ most esteemed faith-based organisations, all with a remarkable track record of serving humanity in all corners of the world. Who, apparently, are seeking to engage this Administration “constructively”, with some praising the “unprecedented” outreach of members of this Administration in engaging, largely (some would say exclusively), with certain Christian NGOs, certain Christian religious leaders, and certain Christian faith protagonists – no doubt to further noble objectives. Apparently, this is a form of strategic engagement of/with religion.

Even though there were likely some who felt uncomfortable with aspects of this rhetoric, the studiously diplomatic silences – including my own – about challenging anything said, was noteworthy. The bottom line is, “we need access to the White House… we need more resources to do our (good) work”.

Why was I silent? Because I am the quintessential ‘other’ whose outspokenness has already earned me the loss of a sense of ‘home’ and security, many times over. This is neither excuse nor justification, rather, an acknowledgement of cowardice.

Into this Kafkaesque reality, let me ask a few questions I am battling with: what will it take to speak truth to power publicly – the way Minnesotans and Palestinians are having to do with their own regimes? Is it strategic to be silent, or such consummate diplomats, especially when we work in the name of the ‘godly’ – being such “exceptional” actors?

Conversely, is this Administration which we endeavour to be so tactful with, being silent about it’s “divine mission”? Is being “nice and essentially a kind person with their heart in the right place”, and doing godly work, a good reason to work with those who are serving regimes which ignore the rule of law in their own nation and abroad? Does faith-based diplomacy mean we either collude, remain silent, or take the struggle to the streets?

If so, what difference is faith-based diplomacy and engagement actually making to civic engagement, to honoring human rights and the rule of law, or to serving principled leadership? Or do these simply not matter since it is the self-interests of the ruling and rich few, are what matters to determine the integrity of life, planet and leadership?

Perhaps we should ponder the advice of the Indian Diplomat, given to his Western counterpart 22 years ago: how can we “be careful”?

Professor Azza Karam serves as President of Lead Integrity; and Director of the Kahane UN Program, for Occidental College’s Diplomacy and World Affairs.

IPS UN Bureau

 

Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');  

Les prix flambent mais les salaires stagnent. Face au blocage des négociations entre syndicats, gouvernement et patronat, le mouvement social s'intensifie, tandis que les autorités dénoncent une « instrumentalisation politique » du mécontentement.

- Articles / Macédoine du Nord, Société, Economie, Politique, Radio Slobodna Evropa

The US signals that restoring democracy is no longer a priority and it is ready to work with Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.

England captain Fran Williams laments her team's performance as they are beaten 65-50 by South Africa in their series decider in Johannesburg.

Considéré comme symbole de la résistance anticoloniale française, Béhanzin le roi de Dahomey reste une figure importante de la mémoire béninoise contemporaine.

Deux anciens hauts responsables du département américain de la Défense, le Pentagone, ont déclaré dans une interview accordée à BBC Persian que les États-Unis cherchaient encore comment réagir face à l'Iran.

The Zulu king was trying to calm anti-migrant feelings but ended up using a highly derogatory phrase.

BBC Scotland looks at the rise of Motherwell's Tawanda Maswanhise this season.

Depuis quelques années, des travaux d'historiens ont révélé que les Noirs ont fait l'objet de massacres et d'atrocités inhumaines de la part des Nazis.

Donald Trump a déclaré que cet organisme serait « l'une des organisations les plus importantes jamais créées ». Mais on ne sait pas encore exactement comment ni où il fonctionnera.

Unifications nationales ou mariages forcés... L'idée d'union entre la Roumanie et la Moldavie, récemment relancée par Chișinău, rappelle que les frontières ont souvent évolué dans l'histoire des Balkans. Tour d'horizon historique.

- Articles / Courrier des Balkans, petrovic, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Bulgarie, Croatie, Grèce, Roumanie-Moldavie : gel, dégel et regel des relations bilatérales, Macédoine du Nord, Moldavie, Monténégro, Roumanie, Serbie, Slovénie, Turquie, Histoire, centenaire guerre

Unifications nationales ou mariages forcés... L'idée d'union entre la Roumanie et la Moldavie, récemment relancée par Chișinău, rappelle que les frontières ont souvent évolué dans l'histoire des Balkans. Tour d'horizon historique.

- Articles / Courrier des Balkans, petrovic, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Bulgarie, Croatie, Grèce, Roumanie-Moldavie : gel, dégel et regel des relations bilatérales, Macédoine du Nord, Moldavie, Monténégro, Roumanie, Serbie, Slovénie, Turquie, Histoire, centenaire guerre

The Ugandan president’s son, notorious for explosive remarks on X, has ambitions to succeed his father.

Les transporteurs routiers bloquent depuis lundi les frontières de Bosnie-Herzégovine, de la Macédoine du nord, du Monténégro et de Serbie pour dénoncer les nouvelles règles d'entrée et de sortie de l'Espace Schengen. Le mouvement a été levé vendredi.

- Le fil de l'Info / Monténégro, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Macédoine du Nord, Courrier des Balkans, Serbie, Questions européennes, Economie

Les transporteurs routiers bloquent depuis lundi les frontières de Bosnie-Herzégovine, de la Macédoine du nord, du Monténégro et de Serbie pour dénoncer les nouvelles règles d'entrée et de sortie de l'Espace Schengen. Le mouvement a été levé vendredi.

- Le fil de l'Info / Monténégro, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Macédoine du Nord, Courrier des Balkans, Serbie, Questions européennes, Economie

Les transporteurs routiers bloquent depuis lundi les frontières de Bosnie-Herzégovine, de la Macédoine du nord, du Monténégro et de Serbie pour dénoncer les nouvelles règles d'entrée et de sortie de l'Espace Schengen. Le mouvement a été levé vendredi.

- Le fil de l'Info / Monténégro, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Macédoine du Nord, Courrier des Balkans, Serbie, Questions européennes, Economie