Nous vous proposons d'interpeller les député-e-s membres de la commission des Affaires étrangères au sujet de la coopération sécuritaire de la France avec le Tchad
- Tchad / Tchad, Répression, Interpellation des élus, Idriss Déby, Coopération militaire, Coopération policièreMr Johnson made his remarks after Michael Gove and Philip Hammond became the first two Cabinet ministers openly to support leaving the EU unless there is significant reform.
But responding in his Telegraph article, titled ‘We must be ready to leave the EU if we don’t get what we want’, Mr Johnson claimed that, “the question of EU membership is no longer of key importance to the destiny of this country”.
In his article, Mr Johnson added that he supports an EU referendum – but warned that Britain’s problems will not be solved by simply leaving the EU as many of his Conservative colleagues apparently believe.
The mayor asserted:
“If we left the EU, we would end this sterile debate, and we would have to recognise that most of our problems are not caused by ‘Bwussels’, but by chronic British short-termism, inadequate management, sloth, low skills, a culture of easy gratification and underinvestment in both human and physical capital and infrastructure.”
He added:
“Why are we still, person for person, so much less productive than the Germans? That is now a question more than a century old, and the answer is nothing to do with the EU. In or out of the EU, we must have a clear vision of how we are going to be competitive in a global economy.”
Mr Johnson warned that there might be a risk that international companies could stop investing in Britain if we left the EU. He also cautioned that UK firms could be put at a “long-term disadvantage” if Britain was unable to “influence the standards and regulations in Brussels.”
There was also an argument, alerted Mr Johnson, that the EU, “is better placed to strike trade deals with the US, or China, than the UK on its own” – although this proposition hadn’t actually been tested.
Mr Johnson added that, “More generally, there is a risk that leaving the EU will be globally interpreted as a narrow, xenophobic, backward-looking thing to do.”
He wrote that there may be other good reasons for Britain to stay in the EU, “but I can’t think of them now.” On the other hand, if Britain left the EU, “we could save money… we get back our sovereignty.. we can no longer blame Brussels.”
But Mr Johnson’s article concluded that we “have to recognise that most of our problems are not caused by Bwussels..”
And in a nuanced comment on the EU referendum debate, the London Mayor urged, “we need a much more informed debate about the pluses and minuses of EU membership”.
It should be noted that Mr Johnson wrote his article for The Telegraph back in May 2013.
Now, Mr Johnson is campaigning for Britain to leave the European Union. Writing exclusively for the Daily Telegraph he stated, “There is only one way to get the change we want – vote to leave the EU.”
The influential economist, John Maynard Keynes, is often quoted as saying, “When the facts change, I change my mind.”
Have the facts about the EU fundamentally changed since 2013?
No.
So why has Mr Johnson now changed his mind and is campaigning for Britain to leave the EU to ‘solve our problems’?
Your guess is as good as mine..* Join the discussion about this article on Facebook.
___________________________________________________
Other stories by Jon Danzig:To follow my stories please like my Facebook page: Jon Danzig Writes
_________________________________________________
Join and share the discussion on Facebook:
The post How Boris changed his mind on Europe appeared first on Ideas on Europe.
Március 3-tól 6-ig rendezték meg az Utazás Kiállítás keretein belül, immár ötödik alkalommal az Afrika Expo és Vásárt, melynek névadó szponzora idén a HTCC, azaz a Magyar Kereskedelmi és Kulturális Központ volt. A rendezvényt Balogh Sándor, a Magyar Afrika Társaság elnöke nyitotta meg, melyet aznap a Kereskedelmi lehetőségek Afrikában című konferencia követett.
Az amerikai légierő két bázisának építése kezdődött meg Szíria azon területein, melyeket terrorszervezetek szakítottak le az országról, majd azt követően a kurdok ellenőrzése alá kerültek.
L'éditorial de Patrick Le Hyaric. "C’est un renversement inédit des principes qui régissent le travail en France, un pas décisif vers une soumission absolue des travailleurs aux lois du capital."
Zwei Trends bei den Verfassungsreformen haben seit den 1990er Jahren das plebiszitäre Moment in den lateinamerikanischen Präsidialsystemen gestärkt: die verbreitete Einführung der Option einer Wiederwahl sowie der Ausbau direktdemokratischer Mechanismen, zu denen auch das Abberufungsreferendum gehört – mit dem eine weitere Flexibilisierung der Amtszeit einhergeht. In der politischen Praxis entfalten diese Elemente eine besondere Dynamik und sorgen gleichzeitig für größere Kontinuität in der Exekutive. Diese Kombination ist heute in drei Fällen besonders gut zu erkennen: Während es Evo Morales in Bolivien beim Plebiszit vom 21. Februar 2016 misslungen ist, die zweifache konsekutive Wiederwahl verfassungsrechtlich zu verankern, drohen Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela ein Abberufungsreferendum und Dilma Rousseff ein Impeachment-Verfahren im brasilianischen Parlament.