Az elmúlt napokban pozitív változások érkeztek a kamattámogatott hitelek kínálatába, amelyek célja, hogy még kedvezőbb feltételekkel támogassák a hazai vállalkozásokat. Ezek a módosítások jelentős mértékben javítják a finanszírozási lehetőségeket, különösen a GINOP Plusz hitelprogramok és a Széchenyi Kártya Program MAX+ konstrukciói esetében.
A GINOP Plusz hitelprogramok új lehetőségeiA GINOP Plusz-1.4.3. – 0%-os Hitelprogram (Pest vármegye és vidék) és a GINOP Plusz-1.4.4. – 0%-os Budapest Hitelprogram számos pozitív módosításon esett át. Az új szabályozás lehetővé teszi, hogy a kölcsönösszeg teljes, 100%-os részét szállítói előlegként használhassák fel, tárgyi eszközök beszerzése esetén. Ez különösen vonzó lehetőséget jelent azok számára, akik azonnali pénzügyi forrásokra alapozva kívánják fejleszteni eszközparkjukat.
További jelentős változás, hogy eltörölték a kötelező VTSZ-listát, ami egyszerűbbé teszi az eszközbeszerzést a hitelfelvevők számára. Az ingatlan-beruházások körében bővítették a célokat, így a korszerűsítés és felújítás mellett már építésre is lehetőség van – bár utóbbi nem érhető el a Budapest Hitelprogram keretében. Mindemellett emelkedtek a hitelösszegek is – a GINOP Plusz-1.4.3. esetében most akár 150 millió forintig, míg a Budapest Hitelprogramnál 75 millió forintig igényelhetnek finanszírozást a vállalkozások.
Szintén rendkívül előnyös változás, hogy a kezdő vállalkozások is részt vehetnek ezekben a programokban, legfeljebb 25 millió forint igényelt összegig. A hitelprogramok továbbra is 0%-os kamattal érhetők el, támogatva ezzel a vállalkozások fejlődését.
Mire lehet igényelni a hiteleket?A GINOP hitelek sokoldalú felhasználási lehetőségeket biztosítanak, többek között új tárgyi eszközök és informatikai eszközök beszerzésére, immateriális javak vásárlására, építési költségek finanszírozására vagy megújuló energia alapú projektek megvalósítására.
Kamatcsökkentések a Széchenyi Kártya Program MAX+ konstrukcióiban2025. március 1-jétől jelentős mértékű kamatcsökkentés lép érvénybe a Széchenyi Kártya Program MAX+ hiteltermékeinél. A beruházási és lízingkonstrukciók kamata 3%-ra csökken, beleértve az agrárhiteleket is. Ugyanezt az alacsony kamatozást élvezhetik a Mikrohitelek esetében is.
A folyamatosan igényelhető folyószámlahitel, Turisztikai Kártya és Likviditási Hitel kamata szintén mérséklődik, így az új kamatszint 4,5%. A környezetbarát megoldásokat keresők számára pedig jó hír, hogy a „ZÖLD” konstrukciók 1,5%-os kedvezményes kamattal érhetők el továbbra is. Ezek a változások különösen kedvező feltételeket biztosítanak azok számára, akik hosszabb távú fejlesztést vagy azonnali finanszírozási megoldásokat keresnek.
Jelenleg elérhető kamattámogatott hitelekA kamattámogatott hitelprogramok portfóliója sokszínű, lehetőséget nyújtva minden vállalkozás számára, hogy megtalálja a céljainak leginkább megfelelő finanszírozási formát. Például a Széchenyi Kártya MAX+ hitelek között szerepel a Beruházási Hitel MAX+, amely akár 500 millió forintig biztosít forrást. Ez a konstrukció széles körű beruházási célokat támogat, így például gépek és berendezések beszerzését, üzletrész-vásárlást vagy ingatlanfejlesztést.
Ezen felül előnyös választás lehet a Mikrohitel MAX+, amely kisebb összegű finanszírozást nyújt, akár kezdő vállalkozások számára is, maximum 100 millió forint összegben. A likviditás biztosítása érdekében pedig a Likviditási Hitel MAX+ konstrukció áll rendelkezésre, amely azonnali, szabadon felhasználható pénzügyi forrásokat kínál.
További kiemelkedő lehetőség a GINOP Plusz hitelprogramok zöld célú alkonstrukciói, amelyek támogatják az energiahatékonysági fejlesztéseket, többek között napelemek telepítését, hőszigetelési projektek megvalósítását vagy elektromobilitási infrastruktúrák kiépítését.
A digitális fejlesztéseket keresők számára a DIMOP Plusz keretében elérhető digitalizációs programok is izgalmas lehetőséget nyújtanak, immateriális javak (például szoftverek) és felhőszolgáltatások beszerzésével. Ezen hitelek kifejezetten alacsony kamattal, 0%-os feltételekkel érhetők el, és célzottan támogatják a vállalkozások versenyképességének növelését a modern technológiák alkalmazásával.
ÖsszegzésA kamattámogatott hitelprogramok jelenlegi kínálata minden eddiginél kedvezőbb feltételekkel segíti a hazai vállalkozásokat. Legyen szó eszközbeszerzésről, digitális fejlesztésekről vagy zöld beruházásokról, a megfelelő konstrukció kiválasztásával jelentős előnyökre tehet szert. Érdemes mielőbb kihasználni ezeket a lehetőségeket!
Amennyiben bármelyik lehetőség felkeltette érdeklődését, keressen minket bizalommal!
Goodwill Consulting Kft. – Információból fejlesztés, a fejlesztésből siker Pályázni szeretne, vagy további kérdése lenne? Igényeljen ingyenes fejlesztési tanácsadást! VezetéknévKeresztnév
Cégnév
Adószám
Telefon
Fejlesztési elképzelés
[Ha konkrét elképzelése, vagy kérdése van, ossza meg velünk!]
Feliratkozom a hírlevélre
igennem Source
Medium
Campaign
Adatkezelési hozzájárulás
Hozzájárulok,
var utms = ["utm_source", "utm_medium", "utm_campaign"]; var fields = ["Source", "Medium", "Campaign"]; var input = document.querySelectorAll('input[name^="Project"]')[0].name; var formId = input.substring(8, input.search("]")); var urlparams = decodeURIComponent(window.location.search); var params = new URLSearchParams(urlparams); for (var i = 0; i < utms.length; i++) { var param = (params.get(utms[i])) ? params.get(utms[i]) : null; var node = document.getElementById("Project_" + fields[i] + "_" + formId); if (param) { node.value = params.get(utms[i]); } node.previousSibling.parentElement.style.setProperty("display", "none", "important"); }
The post Kamattámogatott hitelek: Újdonságok és lehetőségek appeared first on Goodwill Consulting.
The EU is a democracy, run by elected politicians.
By comparison, the UK seems more like a quasi-democracy, with unelected decision-makers and undemocratic practises that would be considered despotic by EU standards.
The UK Parliament consists of 1,481 members across the Commons and Lords. However, while all 650 MPs in the House of Commons are elected, the remaining 831 members of the House of Lords were appointed and not elected.
Our Parliament has more unelected members than elected.
The number of members of the Lords often fluctuates due to new appointments, leave of absence, and disqualification. Voters have no say in this process.
The House of Lords is the upper chamber of the UK Parliament. It plays a key role in the legislative process, scrutinising government actions, and providing expertise on policy and law.
Although it has limited power compared to the elected House of Commons, for a Bill to become law it must be approved by both the Commons and the Lords except in certain circumstances. Ultimately, however, the elected Commons has the final say over legislation.
The House of Lords is the only upper house of any two-chamber parliament in the world to be larger than its lower house.*
[*Source: Alan Siaroff, Comparing Political Regimes]
By stark contrast, the European Parliament has 720 members, all elected.
Just look at other aspects of so-called British ‘democracy’ that would be considered alien in the EU:
We have a legislative system whereby most laws are made by Statutory Instruments, drafted by the Civil Service, which cannot be amended by Parliament and most of which become law automatically, without a Parliamentary vote.
We have governments that can bypass Parliament with the use – and abuse – of arcane and ancient Royal Prerogatives and Henry VIII clauses.
We have an old-fashioned voting system of first-past-the-post resulting in governments that most people didn’t vote for. (In European Parliament elections, voting is by proportional representation).
We had a Prime Minister who could (until it was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court) close down Parliament for an extended period at his will and without Parliamentary approval.
We had a Prime Minister who attempted to initiate Brexit without Parliamentary authority and spent considerable sums of public money in litigation defending her “right” to do so.
We had a government that gave lucrative contracts to their friends, bypassing usual procurement procedures and public accountability.
We had a referendum in which two out of the four nations of the United Kingdom, along with Gibraltar, voted strongly against Brexit, but the UK government went ahead with it anyway.
We have an unelected head of state (although the King has no real power to intervene on important issues).
None of these undemocratic situations would be acceptable in the EU.
But how many people in Britain truly know that the EU is a democracy?
For years, Brexit politicians and papers have been selling us the blatant lie that the EU is undemocratic, even a “dictatorship” and run by unelected bureaucrats.
Let me take this opportunity to explain why that is not the case.
EU MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTSIn the EU, democratic governance is the number one requirement of European Union membership.
In 1962, the year after Britain first applied to join the EEC, Spain also applied.
The country was then governed by authoritarian dictator, Francisco Franco. Spain’s membership application was flatly and unanimously rejected by all members of the European Community.
The reason? Because Spain wasn’t a democracy.
Indeed, if the UK was applying to join the EU now, recent events could present questions over the validity of our application and whether our democratic governance is currently robust enough.
Remember, recent Tory governments wanted to scrap our Human Rights Act and also opposed the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Conservative leaders have also threatened to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. The current Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, has said she was willing to consider leaving the Convention if she became Prime Minister.
Such a move would bar us from joining the EU, where a commitment to human rights is a strict membership requirement.
Before becoming a member of the EU, an applicant country must demonstrate that it has a stable government guaranteeing:
Most countries that applied to join the EU did not meet these strict membership requirements and so they needed many years to prepare for the process before their application could be accepted.
NOTE: The UK’s unelected House of Lords may be a barrier to the UK being accepted as an EU member if we apply to re-join. We may have got away with having an unelected second chamber when we first joined in 1973, but there is a question mark over whether our application would be successful again without deep constitutional reforms in the UK.
EU MEMBERSContrary to what many people in Britain understand, the EU is a democracy, democratically run by its members.
These comprise the democratically elected governments and Parliaments of EU member states, alongside the directly elected European Parliament.
All the treaties of the EU, upon which all EU laws must be compatible, and any new countries applying to join the EU, must be unanimously and democratically agreed by all the national parliaments of every EU member state, however large or small.
In some EU countries, according to their national constitutions, agreement must also be obtained by regional parliaments and national referendums.
All the EEC/EU treaties since Britain joined the European Community in 1973 were fully debated and democratically passed by our Parliament in Westminster.
Not once were any changes to our EU membership imposed upon us, and neither could they be, as the EU is a democracy.
In addition, every EU country has a veto on any treaty changes or any new country joining.
(Compare that to our referendum of 2016, when a majority of citizens in Scotland and Northern Ireland voted against Brexit, but it made no difference.)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTThe European Parliament is the EU’s law-making body, alongside the EU Council, also called the Council of Ministers, which comprises the departmental ministers of democratically elected governments of every EU country.
The Parliament is directly elected every five years by citizens in all EU countries. The latest European elections were held in June 2024.
There are 720 MEPs (we used to have 73 MEPs from the UK representing us in Europe; alas, no more).
Each European country is proportionally represented in the Parliament according to their size of population.
EU laws can only be passed by the European Parliament in concert with the Council of Ministers.
The Council shares law making and budgetary powers with the European Parliament. When voting on proposed EU laws, its meetings must be public.
Alongside the Council, the European Parliament has the democratic power to accept, amend or reject proposed laws and regulations.
According to extensive research at the time by VoteWatch Europe, over 97% of adopted EU laws in the 12 years to 2016 were supported by the UK.
There are proposals to give the European Parliament new powers to directly initiate legislation.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSIONThe European Commission is the servant of the EU, and not its master. Ultimately, the Commission is beholden to the European Parliament, and not the other way around.
The candidates for Commission President are proposed by a qualified majority of the European Council, which comprises the Prime Ministers or Heads of States of EU countries, taking account of the latest European elections.
Similarly, the Commission is composed of one member from each member state “suggested” by the national governments of each member state, but elected by a qualified majority of the European Council.
The Commission President must then be elected by an absolute majority of all MEPs (i.e. over 50% of them).
Indeed, Ursula von der Leyen could only become Commission President – for a second term – with the democratic backing of over half of ALL MEPs.
Each proposed Commissioner must also be democratically approved by the European Parliament in a strict vetting process. The Parliament has the democratic power to reject candidate Commissioners – as two were in in 2019.
After the 2024 European Parliament elections, European Parliament’s hearings, held in November 2024, involved rigorous evaluations of the Commissioners-designate. While no nominees were outright rejected, several faced intense scrutiny and challenges during their hearings.
The Parliament also has the democratic power to sack the entire Commission at any time during its five-year tenure.
The Commission is responsible for implementing the democratic decisions of the EU, upholding and enforcing democratically passed EU laws and treaties, and managing the day-to-day business of the EU.
The Commission also proposes new laws, but they only do this in close collaboration with the European Parliament and Council of Ministers, as only the Parliament and Council can pass laws.
The Commission has zero power to pass any laws.
Before the Commission proposes new laws, it prepares ‘Impact Assessments’ which set out the advantages and disadvantages of possible policy options.
The Commission then consults interested parties such as non-governmental organisations, local authorities and representatives of industry and civil society. Groups of experts also give advice on technical issues.
In this way, the Commission ensures that legislative proposals correspond to the needs of those most concerned and avoids unnecessary red tape.
Citizens, businesses and organisations also participate in the consultation procedure. National parliaments can also formally express their reservations if they feel that it would be better to deal with an issue at national rather than EU level.
THE EUROPEAN COUNCILThe European Council consists of the democratically elected leaders of each EU country – their Prime Ministers and Presidents. It is the EU’s supreme political authority.
The Council does not negotiate or adopt EU laws, but it does democratically set the political goals and priorities of the European Union, including the policy agenda of the Commission.
The Council also democratically chooses candidates for the post of Commission President, which the European Parliament must then elect with an absolute majority of MEPs.
The Council President reports to the European Parliament.
UK MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUDuring our membership, Britain democratically helped to run and rule the EU, and not the other way around. Whatever the EU is and has become, Britain helped to create it.
Indeed, the EU can become whatever all its members unanimously agree it can become. But of course, that only applies to EU members, and not to ex-members.
Outside of the EU, Britain can only watch as democratic decisions about our continent are decided without us, even though those decisions affect us just as much, whether we are a member or not.
Leaving the EU has meant a loss of sovereignty. We no longer have a say, votes, and vetoes on the running and future direction of Europe.
The post The EU is more democratic than the UK appeared first on Ideas on Europe.
Read here in pdf the Policy Paper by George Andreou, Research Fellow, ELIAMEP; Assistant Professor at the School of Political Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (in Greek).