Just Transitions (JT) toward sustainable, equitable, and low-carbon futures have become a central focus of global climate policy, exemplified by initiatives such as Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JET-Ps) and the UNFCCC Just Transition Work Programme (JTWP). For some actors, JT is understood in sectoral terms, focusing on energy transitions. Others emphasise more transformative approaches grounded in global structural reform and climate justice. Although existing scholarship has mapped JT framings in the literature, across national climate policy and non-academic frameworks, no study has yet examined how individuals shaping global climate policy themselves understand and prioritise JT. Approximately 130 Blue Zone-accredited attendees (i.e. those with access to the formal negotiations) were surveyed at COP28 in Dubai, including party delegates, policy-makers, civil society representatives and others. The survey was structured around five JT typologies – from least to most transformative – drawn from existing literature, as well two novel typologies: one centered on energy, another on sustainable development. Results indicate a strong preference for approaches extending beyond energy to encompass broader sustainable development concerns, with policy coherence identified as a crucial governance principle. Respondents also favour more transformative policies around global structural reform and climate finance for lower-income countries, while the most prioritized justice dimension is accountability and responsibility for climate change. The results also show differences in preferences between participants from high- and lower-income countries, with the latter favouring more transformative notions of JT. However, overall, JT preferences straddle multiple typologies, suggesting that policy mixes delivering broader sustainable development outcomes could provide an effective and politically viable way to reconcile competing views. By exploring the perspectives of those shaping global climate policy, the paper enriches scholarly discussions on JT framings, while offering guidance and directions for the ongoing JTWP negotiations amidst the latest COP30 decision to establish a global just transition mechanism.
Une nouvelle ère s’ouvre pour la filière café au Nord-Kivu et en Ituri. Le projet de relance de la culture du café robusta dans ces deux provinces a été officiellement lancé samedi 28 février à Beni, chef‑lieu provisoire du Nord-Kivu, par le gouverneur de province, le général Evariste Kakule Somo. Ce projet vise douze mille agriculteurs.
Les Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo (FARDC) annoncent avoir repris, dimanche 1er mard, la cité de Mikenge, située dans le territoire de Fizi, province du Sud-Kivu, après de violents affrontements contre les rebelles dans les Hauts Plateaux. La cité, localisée à proximité de Minembwe, constitue depuis plusieurs années l’un des épicentres de la crise sécuritaire dans l’est du pays.
Le ministre des Infrastructures et Travaux publics, John Banza, séjourne depuis ce dimanche 1er mars à Bandundu (Kwilu), dans le cadre des préparatifs de la 13ᵉ Conférence des gouverneurs. Accompagné des directeurs généraux de l’Office des routes (OR) et de l’Office de voirie et drainage (OVD), il a procédé à une série d’inspections sur plusieurs sites stratégiques appelés à accueillir cet événement national.
The People’s Republic of China has considerably expanded its engagement with the United Nations (UN) system, but its influence differs significantly across issue areas. Despite this unevenness, patterns in Beijing’s multilateral priorities suggest what a growing Chinese footprint may portend for the future of the UN. We examine this via three main dimensions. With regard to the underlying logic of multilateralism, China emphasises intergovernmental control at the expense of more autonomous UN bureaucracies. On the substance of multilateralism, China’s objective to ensure the primacy of the state challenges core liberal values long promoted by the UN. In terms of multilateral power dynamics, Beijing works towards increasing space for the UN’s developing country majority, with China as its de facto leader. The Trump administration’s attack on international organisations further strengthens Beijing’s bid to reshape UN multilateralism. The paper assesses the implications of these reordering pathways and concludes with policy recommendations.