European Union

MEPs want social inclusion and people’s wellbeing at the heart of EU economic policies, with equal priority given to social, environmental and economic objectives.
Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Coinhouse a démarré son activité dans le marché boursier en 2014. Certes, il est considéré comme un site de change digne de son nom. Depuis l’époque, il est possible d’acheter des cryptomonnaies auprès de celui-ci moyennant votre pièce d’identité ainsi que votre portefeuille de cryptomonnaies. À l’heure actuelle, il a diversifié ses produits, tout en proposant 200 cryptos à leurs clients potentiels.

Généralités sur Coinhouse

Par rapport à ses pairs, Coinhouse est une plateforme légale. Ce qui lui permet d’agir sur le marché des cryptomonnaies. Le petit bémol est que celle-ci soutire des coûts conséquents aux traders. Ce qui entraîne parfois la démotivation des négociateurs financiers. Lorsque ces derniers travaillent en permanence sur le marché financier, ils ont l’objectif de profiter de la fluctuation du cours de change.

Quelques étapes d’inscription sur Coinhouse

Afin d’en profiter de la tendance du marché financier, il est capital de passer par l’inscription. De la même manière que celle de xtb, la procédure est très facile et rapide. De plus, elle est totalement gratuite, ce qui ne vous engage en rien. Ainsi, l’idéal est de vous abonner sur la page de Coinhouse. Une fois que vous êtes sur le site en question, vous devrez bien remplir le formulaire d’inscription dans la case indiquée. Pour valider votre adhésion, il ne vous reste qu’à envoyer une copie de votre pièce d’identité, moyennant votre photo.

Coûts des taxes prélevés par Coinhouse et technique des transactions

Il s’agit ici de vous énoncer succinctement deux points essentiels, dont les coûts des taxes et les modes de transactions auprès du site.

Coûts des taxes prélevés par Coinhouse

Certains investisseurs risquent d’être déçus face aux taxes soutirées par Coinhouse. Le problème réside sur le fait que ces derniers n’en tirent que quelques profits malgré les négociations effectuées sur le site en question. Si vous envisagez de négocier pour un seuil limite de 10 000 euros, la taxe est estimée à 6 %.

Technique des transactions

Dans le cadre des achats et des ventes de Bitcoins, vous devez vous rendre sur le site de Coinhouse. Vous n’avez qu’à repérer la rubrique “acheter des Bitcoins” ou “vendre des Bitcoins”. Et vous devez remplir, comme il faut, les rubriques correspondantes.

Notre avis radical sur Coinhouse

Compte tenu des caractéristiques globales de Coinhouse, on peut s’enrichir sur le site. Le seul malaise sur le site est les taxes prélevées par la plateforme.

President David Sassoli will set out Parliament’s position on the EU's next long-term budget at an EU summit on Friday.

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

In a resolution adopted on Thursday, the European Parliament reiterates its deep concern at the severity of the humanitarian emergency in Venezuela.
Committee on Foreign Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

In a resolution adopted on Thursday, the European Parliament reiterates its deep concern at the severity of the humanitarian emergency in Venezuela.
Committee on Foreign Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

On Friday the names of the MEPs who will sit on the new committees established in June were announced.
Committee on Foreign Affairs
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Committee on Legal Affairs
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

On Friday the names of the MEPs who will sit on the new committees established in June were announced.
Committee on Foreign Affairs
Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Committee on Legal Affairs
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Friday, 10 July

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

On 13 July, AFET will debate external policy priorities with Heiko Maas, Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs of Germany. The Minister and MEPs will discuss the upcoming challenges and possible solutions, as Germany takes over the rotating presidency of the Council in a very challenging moment for the European Union.
During this Presidency, the EU will need to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects, reach an agreement on the next multiannual budget and finalise negotiations on future relations with the United Kingdom. Enlargement, Eastern and Southern neighbourhood, Africa and transatlantic relations will also be high on the foreign affairs agenda.
Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Source : © European Union, 2020 - EP

Banca Transilvania
Approximation of laws
A contractual term which has not been negotiated but which reflects a rule that, under national law, applies between parties provided that no other arrangements have been established in that respect, falls outside the scope of EU law on unfair terms in consumer contracts

Scary

I was very glad to have attended the EPOW seminar series this week, where one of my longer-standing thoughts about Brexit finally got some more robust grounding than the impressionistic approach I’ve taken to date. Sara Hobolt was presenting her co-authored paper on the impact of attitudes towards Brexit on attitudes towards your own country’s membership of the EU, using the EES in May 2019 to conduct an EU28-wide experimental design. You can watch Sara’s excellent presentation on the link, but essentially if you think Brexit is bad for the UK, then you’ll think your country leaving the EU will also be bad, especially if your country is economically more exposed to the UK. But the team went beyond this with this experimental arm, exposing sub-groups to positive or negative statements about Brexit, to see if that had any effect. Here, the negative messaging – on economic costs – didn’t have a significant impact on attitudes, but the positive messaging – on taking control over laws, including migration – did have a measurable effect, making people more likely to consider that their country would do well from leaving the EU and to vote to Leave in a referendum. The argument for this differential was that respondents have likely been desensitised to negative messages on Brexit – remember that May 2019 was after the second extension of Art.50 and the middle of the ratification arguments in the UK – so only the positive messages would have been novel and surprising. Thus, even if Brexit has been a deterrent so far to further withdrawals, the scope for that to change in the future is clear. And it’s here that Sara’s evidence seems to give substance to the argument I’ve been making about the ‘ice-breaking‘ nature of Brexit. The simple fact of the UK’s withdrawal has opened up a new political potentiality for others to exploit: leaving the EU is no longer a theoretical possibility, but a political reality. And the generally negative framing of that process in other EU member states – by media, by politicians, by publics – leaves open a strong possibility of that potentiality being exploited by eurosceptic and anti-EU political actors. As we know from the UK, the relative unwillingness of political elites to communicate why the balance of costs and benefits tips towards membership doesn’t mean that it’s not an issue, but rather than critical voices tend to make the running in the public debate. To use Hooghe and Marks’ phrase, the constraining dissensus that characterises the past couple of decades of European integration tends to lead to a more defensive positioning by elites, reacting rather than agenda-setting. And so we might expect that in the next phase of Brexit, as the UK moves out of transition, the potential for sceptics to sell a new message about the process to publics across Europe will grow. Even in the most pessimistic economic analyses, the UK will not collapse as an economy or as a state (pace Peter Foster’s thread yesterday on Scotland and the UK internal market). Thrown in the considerable disruption that everyone will experience from Covid, plus all the non-economic dimensions and it’s not that difficult to fashion a narrative that the UK has benefited from leaving. That would serve domestic agendas of eurosceptics in other countries, especially if the EU’s response to Covid is the seeming imposition of more obligations – financial or political – on member states or the weakening of benefits – reduced structural funds, less free movement, etc. If publics are more susceptible to positive messaging, as Sara’s work suggests, then that opens the possibility of a similar outmanoeuvring of elites as too place in the UK in the run-up to the referendum: benign neglect and a belief in the weight of the status quo isn’t a robust basis for those who wish to maintain the system. Marlene Wind makes a similar case in her recent book, arguing that there has to be a much more pro-active promotion of the liberal and democratic values that European integration claims to protect. Whether governments and parties actually follow through with that agenda is rather more in question than you might expect.

The post From deterrent to contagion: Brexit as a cautionary tale? appeared first on Ideas on Europe.